Well I had drafted an email on 26^th March but I guess I thought it was just another parody of myself so I didn’t bother sending it as I considered it once again to be a bit confrontational. Ah well here goes:

How do Everyone

Thanks ever so much for that. I feel on balance that has pretty much summed up the disparity in thinking between everyone and reflects the polarised nature of the debate.

I’d just like confirmation on the fact that the fence has been removed and that C4SLs have been adopted as suitable for the planning purpose. Or did I just dream that I read that somewhere?

As the debate continues I’d just like that cleared up. Whether it is consensually accepted or not.

With regard to asbestos I can’t see how a chemical modelling system (such as CLEA) can be employed to model asbestos.

I’ll step back from that fuse now. Bye!!

Cheers everyone. J

Russ

Folks,

DEFRA has just that the outputs from project SP1011 are available at:

http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=136

The outputs comprise three documents: covering England, Wales and the impacts of the revised Statutory Guidance in each country. The reports review progress to the end of December 2013 and also the findings of a survey carried out in early 2014.

The project was led by Cranfield University with inputs from CL:AIRE’s Nicola Harries, Brian Bone of Bone Environmental, Naomi Earl and Steve Moreby.

Defra advise that the Environment Agency will be using the State of Contaminated Land (England) report to produce & publish their own report over the summer.

Happy Reading!

Paul Nathanail

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee

and may contain confidential information. If you have received this

message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this

message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the

author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the

University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an

attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your

computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email

communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as

permitted by UK legislation.