 |
 |
I include the dedicatee if I think it's relevant to the collection or my library in some way e.g. it's dedicated to the collection donor / a former principal of the House etc. So almost as if it were provenance (but not quite). Can be a tricky decision on a catalogue shared with other libraries, though. Anna J -----Original Message----- From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of High, Brandon Sent: 16 April 2015 11:18 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of Record 1 I often include information about dedicatees when I catalogue historical medical monographs, as dedications can supply useful information about members of the medical profession. Brandon High [log in to unmask] Special Collections Officer Foyle Special Collections Library King's College London ________________________________________ From: CIG E-Forum [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of O'Brien, Iris [[log in to unmask]] Sent: 16 April 2015 11:12 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of Record 1 Not a silly question at all, Jennifer. I sometimes include access points for well-known dedicatees or for dedicatees in records for books by well-known authors. ------------------------------------------------------ Iris O'Brien Early Printed Collections Cataloguing and Processing Manager The British Library St Pancras 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB Tel.: +44 (0)20 7412 7731 E-mail: [log in to unmask] From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Dumbelton Sent: 16 April 2015 11:01 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of Record 1 There wasn't anything that jumped out at me, apart from the fact that a couple of you transcripted the commas, while others left it out. I haven't had an opportunity to do a full record, unfortunately, but I did leave them in. This might be a silly question, but I wondered whether there might be any circumstances under which you'd include the dedicatee (James Shaen) as a 700 field. Given interest in provenance & associaions, I wasn't sure whether this might be relevant in some cases. It feels perhaps a bit excessive, but I can imagine there might be times when readers might be interested in information like that. Best, Jennifer From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:[log in to unmask]]> On Behalf Of O'Brien, Iris Sent: 16 April 2015 10:40 To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of Record 1 I think the records look pretty similar. Those of you who don't have a lot of rare books cataloguing experience, is there anything in the records that looks unusual to you? Or do you have any other questions or comments? When I created my record I thought for this exercise I would include citations/references in the 510 in the format of the latest edition of the Standard Citation Forms for Rare Materials Cataloging (available free online: http://rbms.info/scf/ ) to see what it was like even though we actually still follow the previous version within the ESTC. What do you think? It's probably clearer for users not necessarily familiar with these reference works as such but I must say it does take longer to input. ------------------------------------------------------ Iris O'Brien Early Printed Collections Cataloguing and Processing Manager The British Library St Pancras 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB Tel.: +44 (0)20 7412 7731 E-mail: [log in to unmask] ****************************************************************************************************************** Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk<http://www.bl.uk/> The British Library's latest Annual Report and Accounts : www.bl.uk/aboutus/annrep/index.html<http://www.bl.uk/aboutus/annrep/index.html> Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook<http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook> The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled ***************************************************************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. ***************************************************************************************************************** Think before you print