I think I'd second your endorsements.
"*Vraiment*,
Poetry can be so many more things
Than what people mostly believe it is."
--Anselm Hollo
Halvard Johnson
================
[log in to unmask]
<http://www.amazon.com/Remains-To-Be-Seen-Works/dp/1933132787/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1367618323&sr=8-1&keywords=Halvard+Johnson>
Winter Journey <https://www.createspace.com/5376388> <-- Newest!!!
Trapeze <http://issuu.com/swirlmag/docs/halvard_johnson> <--- Newer!!
Junkyard Dog
<http://gradientbooks.blogspot.fi/2015/01/halvard-johnson-junkyard-dog.html>
<--- New!
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Clive James on poetry:
>
>
> http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120881/clive-jamess-poetry-notebook-review
> utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=TNR%20Daily%20Newsletter&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%20-%203%2F23%2F15
>
> I probably disagree about a lot, but some would be interesting, & I agree
> about language. And, finally, Pound.
>
> I'd choose Robert Creeley or Duncan (hell, Adamson, Kroetsch) over Robert
> Lowell (not to mention Olson) (& then a bunch of women he probably has not
> read), but that's my reading...
>
> Doug
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2
> (UofAPress).
> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>
> There is no life that does not rise
> melodic from scales of the marvelous.
>
> To which our grief refers.
>
> Robert Duncan.
>
