Special issue for
the Journal of Alpine Research / Revue de géographie alpine
03/2016
Human Geography of
Post-Socialist Mountain Regions
Call for Papers – Deadline (abstract): May 31, 2015
Responsible:
Matthias
Schmidt, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Germany
Context
The
political
situation during the so-called Cold War divided alpine and
mountain research
into at least two sections. From a Western perspective,
knowledge about the
mountains located behind the iron curtain was very limited as a
consequence of
accessibility difficulties and the fact that studies conducted
by colleagues
from socialist countries were rarely available, written in a
non-Western
language or just ignored. With the 1989/91 transformation, the
numerous
Eurasian mountain ranges, such as the Slovenian Alps, High
Tatra, Carpathians,
Ural, Caucasus, Altai, Tian Shan, Pamir, Changai, Kamchatka, or
the Truong Son
in South East Asia came into focus and raised the awareness of
the
international scientific community. This resulted in several
studies from
various disciplinary backgrounds on physical and socio-economic
aspects of the
mountain areas in former socialist countries.
Although
some of these
studies deal with the socialist past and the post-socialist
present, rarely are
there studies that explicitly point out the particularities of
post-socialism
in relation to mountain areas. Thus, the question arises, in
which way do post-socialist
mountain regions differ from mountains in other world regions
(in terms of land
management, livelihoods, conservation, political governance, or
scientific
considerations)? Are there any particularities that could be
labelled as
post-socialist, post-communist or post-Soviet? In which way do
the legacies
(physical and institutional) of socialist systems influence
environments and
societies in these mountain areas today?
There
is no doubt that
the political, economic, and social systems of party-ruled state
socialism
significantly influenced the way mountains are perceived and
valuated, managed
and utilized. Forces such as the specific forms of
administration, economic
exploitation, ideals of preservation and recreation, social
restructuring and state
control, collectivization, forced sedentarisation or security
requirements,
frame the conditions and activities that have shaped the
specific montane
regions. However, this does not mean to neglect the other, maybe
more
influencing factors such as climate change, transnational
co-operations,
globalization or neoliberalisation processes, that permeate all
mountain areas
in the world. The aim of this special issue is to identify
specific features in
fields such as resource management, nature conservation,
livelihood strategies
and vulnerabilities, migration or tourism that can be
characterized as
post-socialist in mountains of former socialist states.
Keywords: Post-socialism,
post-soviet, political
ecology, resource management, conservation, tourism,
livelihoods, migration
Potential Topics
Resource
management: In many cases a lack of institutions as
consequence of political transition, decollectivisation, and
privatization
processes has led to the exploitation of natural resources and
unsustainable
resource utilization. What are the consequences in ecological,
political or
socioeconomic terms? Is there a renaissance of traditional forms
or is the
development of new, more individualized forms of forest, pasture
and water
utilization more prominent? What are the consequences of the
increasing
commodification of resources on social cohesion?
Nature
conservation: Nature conservation of specific areas was not
unknown in the socialist era; e.g. several national parks and
nature reserve
zones were established in the Soviet Union. How do the dominant
international
conservation concepts fit with these existing reserves, where
are fields of
conflict, and in which way has the nature conservation system
changed?
Livelihoods,
vulnerability and resilience: Economic decline
and
restructuring, and the cutting of state subsidies and market
competence
resulted in higher vulnerabilities and the need to change
livelihood strategies
for most households in peripheral mountain areas. Are there
typical forms of
sustaining livelihoods in post-socialist mountains? In which way
are household
strategies for survival shaped by the socialist legacy? Do
privatization and
liberalization processes mean more vulnerability for the local
populations?
Depopulation of
mountain areas and migration: Mountain areas
are often
peripheral regions in political, economic and social terms. The
outmigration of
mainly young people in several post-socialist mountain areas, to
urban centres
in the lowlands or abroad, leads to depopulation and an overaged
population.
What are the implications of this form of outmigration? What are
the
perspectives for mountain areas marked by an overaged population
and a
decreasing state interest?
Tourism and
mountaineering: Recreational activities for the
socialist labourer was organized and strictly regulated by the
state through
the establishment of specific tourist resorts. The privatization
and easier
accessibility for the international community has changed the
forms,
expressions, and consequences of tourism. This has allowed the
Carpathians,
Caucasus or Tian Shan to become popular trekking and
mountaineering regions.
What are recent strategies and forms of tourism, recreation, and
mountaineering
and what are the consequences?
Timetable
Please
send abstracts
in English (approximately 1000 words) before May 31st, 2015 to
Matthias Schmidt
([log in to unmask]) and Dominique
Baud ([log in to unmask]), University of
Grenoble, Journal
of Alpine Research / Revue de géographie alpine.
Final
articles are
expected in two versions: one is published in one of the Alpine
languages
(French, Italian, or German) or in Spanish; and the other
version is published
in English.
Anne-Laure AMILHAT SZARY
Professeure
Institut de
Géographie Alpine,
Université Joseph Fourier
/ Grenoble-Alpes
CNRS : Laboratoire
PACTE-Territoires, UMR 5194
Membre de l’Institut Universitaire de France
Responsable de l’équipe de recherches F.A.M.M.E,
Frontières
Altérités Marges Mondialisation Expérimentation
(BORDERS / OTHERNESS / MARGINS / GLOBALIZATION/
EXPERIMENT)
http://www.pacte-grenoble.fr/frontiere-alterite-marges-mondialisation/
The antiAtlas of Borders,
A Manifesto, DOI:10.1080/08865655.2014.983302,
Journal
of Borderlands Studies , Volume 29,
Issue 4,
2014,
p.
503-512
Qu'est-ce
qu'une
frontière aujourd'hui ?, PUF 2015
http://www.puf.com/Autres_Collections:Qu%27est-ce_qu%27une_frontière_aujourd%27hui_%3F
14 bis ave. Marie Reynoard
38100
Grenoble, France
tél : (33) 04 76 82 20 80
fax
: (33)
04 76 82 20 01
Page perso :
http://www.pacte-grenoble.fr/blog/membres/amilhat-szary-anne-laure/