The NOAA directive, link below, is NOT for extramural, or grantees. See the top of page two where it lists who this directive is NOT for. It is for NOAA internal.
The NOAA template that the DMPTool had was taken down when we were told by NOAA that it was not for grantees.
--Sherry Lake
Hi, all,
I've noticed that AHRQ has removed (or just moved??) their page with this plan. Has anybody heard anything about that?
Thanks for any news on this.
(oh, and we have pages up re: the OSTP plans too: http://scholcomm.columbia.edu/open-access/public-access-mandates-for-federally-funded-research/ AND http://scholcomm.columbia.edu/data-management/data-management-plan-templates/)
Also, looks like NOAA updated their DMP procedural directive, end of last year https://www.nosc.noaa.gov/EDMC/PD.DMP.phpHave not yet reviewed it for changes from version 1.0, though
Best,Amy_________________________________
Amy Nurnberger, Research Data Manager
Center for Digital Research and Scholarship
Columbia University / 212.851.2827
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
ORCID: 0000-0002-5931-072X
Twitter: @DataAtCU
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Lake, Sherry Heitchew (sah) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Amanda,
I see you have put Scholarly Kitchen’s blog as an overview of AHRQ.
SPARC has an overview of NASA’s use of PMC if you want to add it to your wonderful page. Thanks.
--
Sherry Lake [log in to unmask]
University of Virginia Library
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
"We must all accept that science is data and that data are science, and
thus provide for, and justify the need for the support of, much-improved
data curation." (Science editorial: Hanson, Sugden & Alberts, 2/11/2011).
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
From: <Whitmire>, Amanda Whitmire <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Research Data Management discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 3:16 PM
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: 2nd Federal Agency Releases OA Plan
Hello all,
As more Federal agency plans regarding the OSTP memo have started coming out, more of us academic data librarians are trying to keep track and share information. I am guilty of this. I have information on four US agency public access plans on my website. If there are more that any of you are aware of, please do pass them on.
Warm regards,Amanda
--Amanda L. Whitmire, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Data Management Specialist
Oregon State University Libraries & Press
about | http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/staff/whitmira
ORCID | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-8879
email | [log in to unmask]
phone | 541.737.3133
From: <Kollen>, "Christine E - (kollen)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Research Data Management discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 8:43 AM
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: FW: 2nd Federal Agency Releases OA Plan
Hi everyone:
Another U.S. agency has released its plan for addressing the OSTP memo. Interesting that for data, AHRQ will be contracting with a commercial repository to accept and manage data and the repository will make the data available to the public at no charge. It goes into effect October 2015. I’m assuming there will be more information on what information they will require for data management plans.
Thanks!
Chris Kollen
Chris Kollen
Data Curation Librarian
University of Arizona Library
P.O. Box 210055
Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
From: Lee, Daniel R - (leed)
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 4:45 PM
To: LBRY-Alllfa
Subject: 2nd Federal Agency Releases OA Plan
The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) released their plans that will require all publications and data that results from research they fund to be publicly available within 12 months of publication. The OSTP Memo calling for such plans is almost two years old and this is the second agency to release their plans. For publications, the plan calls for submitting the author’s accepted manuscript into NIH’s PubMed Central, thus making use of an existing repository. For data, the plan call for the agency to cut a deal with a commercial repository for funded researchers who don’t have another place to deposit it. There does seem to be some vagueness remaining regarding whether or not this is the final plan.
David Crotty has an overview in the Scholarly Kitchen today (http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/02/10/u-s-agency-for-healthcare-research-and-quality-ahrq-announces-public-access-policy/) and the full plan can be seen at the AHRQ site (http://www.ahrq.gov/funding/policies/publicaccess/index.html).
Dan