Dear FSL experts,
I ran oxford_asl command on single pCASL data to compute partial volume corrected CBF :
bash oxford_asl -i diffdata -o pvc --tis 3.175 --bolus 1.650 --casl -c control_brain -s T1_brain --tr 4.05 --te 14 --regfrom control_brain --pvcorr
Here I used skull-stripped control images for calibration (
-c control_brain)
and registration (
--regfrom control_brain).
So my question is : Is it better to use skull-stripped control images or the mean of the raw data to improve the registration ?
Best regards,
-------------------------------------
Matthieu Vanhoutte, MSc
Research Engineer - Department of Neuroradiology
Regional University Hospital, Lille, France