 |
 |
Hi, Just picked this up from the forum. It seems that the review process is being redesigned. Good!! I wonder if there is anyway we could be involved in the testing? Hazel are you going to commend on this one? The republishing after every note because you have to put them in the Library notes field to make them stick is a real problem. Jane K ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marie Simmons <[log in to unmask]> Date: 1 December 2014 at 10:08 Subject: Using Acquisitions Reviews with Force Review To: [log in to unmask] This is our first year of using Talis Acquisitions Reviews, and we are currently have ‘Force review’ switched on. We are finding the volume of acquisitions reviews hard to keep pace with, and are finding that many boomerang back to us, and that the notes vanish. We are discovering little workarounds as we go, but I wondered if anyone with a bit more time under their belt had come up with a workflow for acquisitions reviews that fits the way the software works just now? I am aware that the Reviews are being redesigned, so don’t want to spend too much time re-inventing the wheel, if someone else has already developed an elegant workflow, that uses the mimimum of staff time? Any advice appreciated. Marie Simmons Bibliographic Services Manager University of Dundee tel: 01382-3(86548) fax:01382-386228 The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096 ------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the LIS-TALIS-ASPIRE list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-TALIS-ASPIRE&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the LIS-TALIS-ASPIRE list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-TALIS-ASPIRE&A=1