I thought it had been fixed in June July TBH. cheers alessandra On 14/11/2014 13:29, Andrew Lahiff wrote: > Isn't it well known that the accounting portal has never handled multicore jobs properly? > > Regards, > Andrew. > > ________________________________ > From: Alessandra Forti [[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:23 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Fwd: Multicore accounting > > Dear UK sites, > > could you also go through this exercise please and check the accounting numbers are correct for your site? I particular I see few blue boxes in the efficiency [1] (i.e. CPUtime> walltime) > > Have all CREAM-CE sites enabled the multicore support (see below)? > > The CESGA portal maybe the problem as PIC is stating but I'd like to iron out any misconfiguration before. > > thanks > > cheers > alessandra > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/kwlwang > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Multicore accounting > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:06:58 +0000 > From: Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]> > To: WLCG Multicore Deployment TF <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>, Rob Quick <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]> > > > > Dear all, > > this is another thread we need to check. We have receipes to enable > accounting for CREAM CEs and ARC-CEs should be working out of the box, > but I'd like sites to check their status. There seem to be some > discrepancies at some sites. We'd like to understand where they are > coming from i.e. have the sites published all the data? Have they > enabled the multicore counting in CREAM-CE [1]? Is it a portal problem? > > Next week we have been asked to report at the WLCG MB about this so any > info about discrepancies we need to investigate (or also if it works > perfectly) you can send us is much appreciated. > > thanks > > cheers > alessandra > > [1] > https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/MulticoreTFReports#Report_18_09_2014 > > -- > Respect is a rational process. > > > > -- Respect is a rational process.