 |
 |
Thanks, David. Previously I had created a page in the wiki with the intention that we record our publications, so we can at least see each other's "external" work (presentations and publications to people outside the MS community). https://wiki.moonshot.ja.net/display/Moonshot/Moonshot+presentations%2C+talks%2C+publications The incentive for authors to add their stuff would be increased likelihood of being cited. And of course the honour and glory and respect of your peers :-) But maybe this is not a useful way of doing it. Cheers --jens On 04/11/2014 21:50, David Chadwick wrote: > Hi Jens > > I should have put a paper in, but I did not have time, and our work was > not finished by the closing date for papers. I am at the OpenStack > meeting in Paris this week where I will demonstrate our work on managing > user groups in federated OpenStack, which will leverage both SAML and > ABFAB federation technologies. So I do plan to write a paper before the > end of the year on this, and then find a suitable conference to submit it to > > regards > > David > > > On 04/11/2014 18:10, Jensen, Jens (STFC,RAL,SC) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With profuse apologies for once again asking a non-technical question, >> but is anyone planning to shoot Moons at the UCC2014 workshop(s)? >> http://computing.derby.ac.uk/ucc2014/ >> >> In particular I am on the PC of this thing: >> http://www.cloudfederationmanagement.org >> <https://www.easychair.org/utils/wild.cgi?ws=12401696690367068938> which >> is about federated identity management and I don't see any Moonshots >> among the submissions. >> >> But the reason I ask is that there's discussion with the organisers >> whether to have interoperation and demonstrations, and we know there is >> some interest in federated identity management. >> >> There are four options: >> (a) People are attending UCC and would like to demonstrate some Moonshot >> stuff - in which case we go back to the organisers and get rooms. >> (b) People will not be attending UCC but will be willing to show off >> stuff at a co-located one day event if it weren't as expensive as the >> main conference (scheduled for Friday 12th Dec). >> (c) People will not be attending UCC but will be willing to show at the >> co-located event if it was free. >> (d) People will not be attending either way. >> >> In my humble opinion, those IEEE events are quite expensive, and there >> might be a case for benefiting from people travelling to UCC and have an >> interoperation day co-located with it. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> While we are on the subject, I am slightly curious whether anyone is >> organising ABFAB events in Honolulu next week? >> >> Thanks >> --jens >> >> >> -- >> Scanned by iCritical. >> >> -- Scanned by iCritical.