any suggestions ?
any help or comment is appreciated

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Alireza Sedghi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alireza Sedghi <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [FSL] Fwd: unusual PCA estimates for Partial FOV
To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>


Hi
thanks for your response
yes , i removed couple of time points from first of data.
components look like noise but i can distinguish the right activation in component 5 which has 11.11 % of explained variance;     0.99 % of total variance.
( i could not attach the spatial map, the system said your email is over 200 KB)

here is the output of FIX with standard training

filtered_func_data.ica
1, Unclassified Noise, True
2, Unclassified Noise, True
3, Signal, False
4, Unclassified Noise, True
5, Signal, False
6, Signal, False
7, Signal, False
8, Unknown, False
9, Signal, False
[1, 2, 4]





--

Sincerely,

Alireza Sedghi

Graduate Research Assistant 
Laboratory of Machine Vision and Biomedical Image Processing
Department of Biomedical Engineering
K.N.Toosi University of Technology