Print

Print


I agree with Katrina – our Discovery and Metadata team is creating/managing the metadata for catalogue, the institutional repository and the digital library, so we have a finger in many pies.  There are also occasions when our expertise can be used more widely in the University so we’re keen to take those opportunities as well.

Helen

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Clifford, Katrina M
Sent: 25 November 2014 13:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Outsourcing cataloguing

 

To an extent we do outsource a bit in that we’re going to be buying in records. I’ve been involved in ensuring the records meet our standards and we’ve had some very interesting discussions as a team about what is/isn’t important.

 

That’s going to free us up nicely to concentrate on much more complicated things.

 

I think that ‘cataloguers’ have skills though that can be applied to many things like repository work or describing digital resources. Therefore a lot of it (trying to take it back to the employability point) is about honing skills in data accuracy and in understanding why things like standards are important.

 

Katrina

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lynne Dyer
Sent: 25 November 2014 12:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Outsourcing cataloguing

 

Esther, you’ve made a very valid point in my mind. In the event of outsourcing cataloguing, I would imagine that if cataloguers were kept in employment , their organisation would have them doing cataloguing-related activities: One would have to ensure that the importance of checking the quality of outsourced bib records must be argued with the employer and quality checks built in to these activities. #breathesasighofreliefthatwedontoutsource

 

Lynne

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Esther Arens
Sent: 25 November 2014 12:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Outsourcing cataloguing

 

 

I'm actually not generally against outsourcing cataloguing tasks - if of good quality it obviously saves time and money; and any professionals might simply* work for a different employer. It also means that international standard will be maintained to a greater extent because these records aren't just done for one particular institution. That's probably why public libraries have even less cataloguers than e.g. the HE sector. BUT: If there's no-one left with that expertise then how can the quality of bought-in records be assessed? And how can any retrieval issues be diagnosed and resolved if no-one understands the workings of the metadata in whatever discovery system is used? 

 

--
Esther Arens MCLIP
The Precentory
23 St Martins
Leicester LE1 5DE


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer