 |
 |
HI - sorry, I didn't answer this before as I couldn't understand the question..... Cheers, Steve. On 15 Oct 2014, at 15:48, Paul Beach <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Sorry - repost as I never heard back on the first try... > > > FSLers, > > So when using dual-regression/randomise I know that you have to look at t-stat values for associated, non-interaction contrasts to interpret significant interaction effects. > > However, I'm a bit unsure as to the best way to do so with FSLnets results. What output should I be looking at to interpret significant interactions - particularly if the non-interaction contrasts are not significant? > > Would I simply look at output from nets_boxplots? > > > Thanks > Paul > -- > Paul Beach > DO/PhD candidate - Year VI > Michigan State University > - College of Osteopathic Medicine > - Neuroscience Program > - MSU Cognitive and Geriatric Neurology Team (CoGeNT) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717) [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet