Print

Print


Hi all,

With HERs we’re entering all dates as BC/AD, I wouldn’t like to confuse things further!

I think a start date of 850,000 BC sounds good..?

Helen Wells
Historic Environment Record Officer
Leicestershire County Council

Planning, Historic & Natural Environment, Leicestershire County Council, County Hall, Glenfield, Leics, LE3 8RA
Telephone: 0116 3058323 / E-mail: [log in to unmask]

From: The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wenban-Smith F.F.
Sent: 23 October 2014 14:41
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [FISH] Session 1.1 Chronology

 

Re comments about dates. The precise year for start end of a particular period is a bit notional for most of the Palaeolithic, since most of our dating is to the nearest few thousand years, if we are lucky. When we get to dealing with the Upper Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and later prehistory - Qs 1.3 onward - there is some discussion of calibrated, uncalibrated, calendar usage etc.

 

Homepage: www.soton.ac.uk/~ffws/New_ffws/index.html

Francis Wenban-Smith (Dr) 
Department of Archaeology (CAHOR - Centre for Applied Human Origins Research)
University of Southampton (Avenue Campus)
Southampton, Hants
SO17 1BF

02380-596 864 (direct)
07771-623 096 (mobile)

 

From: The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stallibrass, Sue
Sent: 23 October 2014 14:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FISH] Session 1 Chronology

 

Sorry to interrupt, but before people start deliberating precise start and end dates for sub/periods, could we discuss how dates are recorded or expressed? Apologies that I am not on HER Forum so don’t know what has already been discussed/decided, but it is important that dates are presented in a consistent manner, and in a manner that can be reviewed (eg if radiocarbon calibration methods are altered or refined). For the early Holocene, dates are sometimes recorded as uncalibrated radiocarbon dates, as calibrated carbon dates, or as  baldly ‘BC’ etc. There is a major discrepancy between the methods of palaeoenvironmental specialists and archaeologists. Given the rapidity of climate changes towards the end of the Pleistocene/start of the Early Holocene (however defined) these disparities in expressions of dates causes much confusion. Along the lines of – well it was about 12,000 years but was that 12,000 years ago or 10,000 BC etc.

Bw

Sue

 

Dr Sue Stallibrass

[log in to unmask]
direct phone: Mondays: 0161 242  1409

Tuesdays – Fridays: 0151 794 5046

English Heritage Science Adviser for North West England

English Heritage Suite 3.3 Canada House

3 Chepstow Street

Manchester M1 5FW

Office Reception: 0161 242 1404


Honorary Associate

 [log in to unmask]

 Department of Archaeology, ACE,
Hartley Building, Brownlow street,
University of Liverpool

LIVERPOOL
L69 3GS

Direct phone: 0151 794 5046

 

From: The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Campbell, Gill
Sent: 23 October 2014 14:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FISH] Labels, Lithics and Landforms e-conference Welcome

 

Dear Colleagues

Welcome on behalf of the FISH terminology Working Group to the Labels, Lithics and Landforms e-conference on controlled vocabularies for Palaeolithic and Mesolithic data

This conference came about as a result of recent Historic Environment Record (HER) enhancement projects funded under the National Heritage Protection Plan Activity 4G1: Pleistocene and Early Holocene Archaeology. Many of the issues involved were highlighted in a presentation by Francis Wenban-Smith at the Historic Environment Record (HER) Forum) in July 2014 with and by subsequent discussion on the HER forum mailing list.

The purpose of the conference is to discuss how Palaeolithic/Mesolithic information could be better indexed and described in research resources in light of recent advances in understanding of these periods and consider mechanisms for achieving this aim. In particular we will focus on the use of existing terminologies and the need for improvement and enhancement of thesauri and wordlists to better capture information about the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic in Britain.

There are 3 sessions covering different themes as follows:

THURSDAY 23rd October
1.) Chronology: 14.00-19.00

FRIDAY 24th October
2.) Landforms, sites and palaeoenvironmental information: 9.00-13.00
3.) Artefacts: 14.00-17.00

 

Could I ask participants if possible to include the session number and point they are addressing in the subject line of their emails (eg.session1: question 1) to help us keep track of the arguments being presented and help with producing summaries of each session.

Also if anyone has any technical issues with their subscription to the list please e-mail [log in to unmask] 

And last but not least thank you for joining us and enjoy the conference! 

Gill

Gill Campbell

Head of Environmental Studies

English Heritage

T: 02392 856780

English Heritage Science Network Convenor

 

www.english-heritage.org.uk

 

 


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.

Portico: your gateway to information on sites in the National Heritage Collection; have a look and tell us what you think.
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/archives-and-collections/portico/

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage, disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply function and then permanently delete what you have received.

Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance with Leicestershire County Council's policy on the use of electronic communications. The contents of e-mails may have to be disclosed to a request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

The views expressed by the author may not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Leicestershire County Council.

Attachments to e-mail messages may contain viruses that may damage your system. Whilst Leicestershire County Council has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept any liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of these factors. You are advised to carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.