Hi Jon,
We (GuíaSalud, Spain) collect a "Clinical Guidelines Bibliography" where
I think you could find some useful articles, for example:
/
//The applicability of grading systems for guidelines.//
//Baker A, Potter J, Young K, Madan I.//
//J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):758-62./
You can find other articles related with GRADE system:
http://portal.guiasalud.es/web/guest/tema-grade
Also, articles and other topics related to clinical guidelines:
http://portal.guiasalud.es/web/guest/temas
Other links that could be for your interest:
* Bibliography:
http://portal.guiasalud.es/web/guest/bibliografia-especializada-gpc
* GuíaSalud (English) http://portal.guiasalud.es/web/guest/english
We have included some of the articles that other colleagues have mention
in previous emails,
Thank you all,
Kind Regards,
Firma
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Sofía Arguis Molina*
Técnico en Documentación y Sistemas de Información
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS)
Secretaría de GuíaSalud - Biblioteca de Guías de Práctica Clínica
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 2
50009 Zaragoza
Tfno. +34 976 71 5517
email. [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
www.iacs.aragon.es
www.guiasalud.es
El 23/10/2014 0:31, Zachary Munn escribió:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Many of the documents developed by the GRADE Working group
> http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ and the DECIDE consortium
> http://www.decide-collaboration.eu/ will be useful here.
>
> Some other useful references in addition to those sent on by Carlos:
>
> Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of
> recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE
> Working Group.
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615589
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15788089
>
> FORM: an Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations
> in evidence-based clinical guidelines.
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356039
>
> Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of
> evidence and recommendations.
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14517128
>
> How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of
> deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the
> health services community.
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20702437
>
> Our grading system is available at the following link:
> http://joannabriggs.org/jbi-approach.html#tabbed-nav=Levels-of-Evidence
>
> If you do find a good overview regarding how end users use these
> systems it would be great if you could share this with the group.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Zac
>
> Dr Zachary Munn
>
> Acting Director, Synthesis Science
>
> Acting Editor-In-Chief, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and
> Implementation Reports
>
> The Joanna Briggs Institute
> School of Translational Health Science
> The University of Adelaide
>
> T: +61 8 8313 0124 | F: +61 8 8313 4881
> W: www.joannabriggs.org <http://www.joannabriggs.org/> |
> www.adelaide.edu.au <http://www.adelaide.edu.au/>
>
> /The Joanna Briggs Institute specialises in working with organisations
> to conduct systematic reviews, scoping reviews and rapid reviews of
> all types of evidence; in delivering education and training in
> evidence-based healthcare; and in running large scale implementation
> projects based on the best available evidence. For further information
> visit: http://joannabriggs.org/research/research-consultancy.html ///
>
> CRICOS Provider number 00123M. This message may contain confidential
> or legally privileged information. If you think it was sent to you by
> mistake, please delete all copies and advise the sender. For the
> purposes of the SPAM Act 2003, this email is authorised by The
> University of Adelaide.
>
> *From:*Evidence based health (EBH)
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Carlos A.
> Cuello Garcia
> *Sent:* Thursday, 23 October 2014 2:12 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Evidence Grading
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Here are some works (sorry for the auto-citation)
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21596725 <-- in the references
> you could find other sources of information
>
> http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0055067
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423078
>
> best
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Jon Brassey
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm starting to look at evidence grading systems and was wondering if
> anyone can recommend:
>
> * A good overview of the different systems, preferably with
> the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
>
> * Any research that looks at how end users use (or not use) the
> grading systems. Ultimately, do they have much of an impact!
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> jon
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos A. Cuello-García, MD, PhD(c)
> HRM· Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
> McMaster University Health Sciences Centre Room 2C14
> 1280 Main Street West
> Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada
> ✆: +1 (905) 525-9140 x22332
>
> Skype: dr.carlos.cuello · Twitter <https://twitter.com/CharlieNeck> ·
> Linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/in/drcuello>
>
