Print

Print


Adam - I am not saying you are wrong, but I would test it.  We are on SP14 and have the option to override the system settings but it doesn't seem to have any effect, hopefully it does work in April 2014 and above as that would help.

Malcolm - I agree with everything you say, apart from your belief that Blackboard could come up with a better name for it.

On 9 October 2014 13:27, Adam Tuncay <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Joseph,

 

Re ‘However if the system level is set to "Always off" or "Always on" then the system level setting is what you get (node setting doesn't have any effect)’

 

In April 2014 the system level setting can be overridden at node level, you are prompted to override system setting when changing.

 

Thanks

 

Adam

 

From: Blackboard/Courseinfo userslist [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph Gliddon
Sent: 09 October 2014 13:05

To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Use of Hierarchies

 

By a huge co-incidence I have just been asked about limiting a tool to a very small subset of our courses.  So I thought I would share my findings.

As you are all aware there are 4 settings

Off (cant be switched on), Default off (can be switched), Default on (can be switched), On (cant be switched on).

 

These settings can be applied at the system level AND at the node levels

Further for the 2 "Default" options, staff can change things at an individual course level via off/on.

 

Ok first for what happens if the system level is "Default" on or off.  Then if you are also in a node then your setting in the Node is what you get.  (ie system = default off, node = default on, result is "on")

 

However if the system level is set to "Always off" or "Always on" then the system level setting is what you get (node setting doesn't have any effect)

 

If you are in more than one node then you get your settings from your primary node.

 

 

The big problem comes when you want the tool to be "On" for only certain courses and "Off (cant be switched on)" for the rest.  You need to make one node for your courses that have the tool and another node for every single other course.  You then associate the courses you want to have the tool to have the on node as their primary node.

Of course if you then have more than one tool you want to limit and start having courses that are entitled to more than one tool then things get really messy.

 

So for now I would recommend what Malcolm suggested and have a node for your entitled courses (and another node for every other course - if you want to avoid others accidentally switching it on).  But at some point you may have to bite the bullet and get a fully fledged hierarchy and have tool decisions at a school/department level.

 

Regards

Joseph

 

 

On 7 October 2014 17:16, Holden Matthew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi Adam

 

I was wondering the same. As you have to indicate a primary node I guess this is where such settings as the tools is taken from. I haven't tested this yet though.

 

Mat 

Sent from my iPhone

 


On 7 Oct 2014, at 15:51, "Adam Tuncay" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Matthew,

 

Thanks. I had previously tested this in SP12 where the feature didn’t exist. We are now on April 2014 where I can see the option, I should really have checked again.

 

Malcolm,

 

Do you have a structure where courses are included in more than one node with the tool setting on in one and off in another? If so does Blackboard respect the on setting and ignore off?

 

Thanks

Adam

 

From: Blackboard/Courseinfo userslist [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of MURRAY M.R.
Sent: 07 October 2014 12:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Use of Hierarchies

 

Matthew is correct - in that you can later change the model, but I think his suggestion will be hard to manage in the long term.

Say you built out a single model based on Faculties and schools. You add the courses to the appropriate school node, and add the tool to it too.

OK, but what if not all courses/modules in that school want/are allowed to use it?

What if other Departments come on Board. Sure, you can create another node for another dept, map the courses and then add the tool too, but very quickly it becomes tricky to know which courses can see which tool. The ability to search through and report on the Institutional Hierarchy is pretty limited.

 

By creating an extra tool based node you can easily see who should and shouldn't be able to access the tool at any time. If you later decide to drop the tool, delete this node and turn off the course feed to it and you are done.

 

My suggestion does require more work for you integration - associating specific courses with the tool node, but I don't mind automated processes working hard if it means people don't!

 

Malcolm.

 

Dr Malcolm Murray  FRGS FHEA CMALT PG Cert

 

eLearning Manager - Computing and Information Services  |  Honorary Fellow - School of Education

Durham University  |  South Road  |  Durham  |  DH1 3LE |  UK  |  http://tinyurl.com/durltt  |  @learntechdurham

 

On 7 Oct 2014, at 12:27pm, Holden Matthew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 

Hi Adam

 

I don’t think that is correct – you can overwrite on the current SPs. What SP are you running?

 

You should be able to set up a node for the school in question adding in any courses which you want to have access to the building block.

 

You can then set the tool to off at system level – ensuring you don’t apply the lock to prevent you from overwriting.

 

Then you should be able to set the tool to on in your node.

 

 

Matthew Holden

Learning Technology System Manager  |  Human Resources Division

Allerton Building, University of Salford, Salford  M5 4WT

t: +44 (0) 161 295 7284

[log in to unmask]  | www.salford.ac.uk

http://www.hr.salford.ac.uk/employee-development/bb9

 

<image001.jpg> 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Blackboard/Courseinfo userslist [mailto:[log in to unmask]On Behalf Of VLE Service
Sent: 07 October 2014 10:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: Use of Hierarchies

 

Hi,

 

We are looking at the possibility of allowing access to publisher building blocks to specific courses within a School. However we don’t currently have an institutional hierarchy in place, we thought that one could be created manually just for the specific School and release the tools to it, but it isn’t possible from what I can tell as a structure is needed for the whole institution if you want to limit/restrict access.

 

It would also be useful if the system level tool setting could be overridden at node level which would enable us to bypass the need for an institutional hierarchy in place, but that isn’t possible either.

 

Has anyone else attempted this? I cant see any way around it.  Any suggestions would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Adam Tuncay
e-Learning (VLES) Team University of Leeds

 

Website: MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "applewebdata:" claiming to be www.leeds.ac.uk/vle

For the latest VLE news, hints, tips & updates visit our blog: http://vleservice.wordpress.com/,follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/leedsvlesupport or subscribe to the mailing list:http://www.leeds.ac.uk/vle/mail_list.htm

 



 

--

Joseph Gliddon

Learning Technologist

Technology Enhanced Learning

Academic Registry

University of Bristol

0117 331 4403




--
Joseph Gliddon
Learning Technologist
Technology Enhanced Learning
Academic Registry
University of Bristol
0117 331 4403