Print

Print


Tom,

Cultural issues are always in the eye of the beholder. I'm going out on a
limb here, taking a punt ... the densely populated island that you live on
that's in the Atlantic... doesn't pitching it in terms of the Atlantic
exclude the North Sea, the Irish Sea, the Channel, the Solent, the
Hebrides, all bodies of water crucial to the culture, history and identity
of the UK?

Of course, I could be reading it wrong, and you could be in the gulf stream
region of the Scilles ...

My understanding of Jen's original point was the old conundrum of push
versus pull technology. It sounds like Jen (apologies for putting words in
your mouth) has requirements for a forum that is more discussion group
based (or similar) with people being able to 'follow' items of interest,
search posts etc. And, perhaps, an area for the posting and sharing of
resources. That is, pull technology with notifications supplying a bit of
'push'. The listserv is seen as a barrier, because (it is assumed) people
are stuck in their ways and reluctant to change. The benefits seen by
people who use the listserv are dismissed (almost out of hand). If I have a
query, I would prefer to shoot it across the listserv, to get as many live
responses. I don't want to rely on others who have the time scanning a
discussion forum-type area.

I also appreciate the ability to do some 'environment-scanning' - being
aware of what's happening by the emails that fly past.

The issue of Peter's emails was one that was always going to creep in, from
the moment the first email was signed off with 'frankly, the emails are out
of control'. Or words to that effect. I disagree. I think they're
managable.

Now Tom is moving on to quality of content, with a dash of politics and
culture.

I'll hold up my hand and say I've a laissez faire approach. If it's
something I want to read, I will. If not, I delete it. I hadn't noticed any
political tone, or been aware of etiquette around it. But, that could be
cultural. I grew up in the same country as Graeme, and even crossed paths
with him in a sub basement in a previous life. (Hundreds and hundreds of
records boxes stored directly beneath the city's storm water drains). It
could be the thinner ozone layer that we were both exposed to that has
clouded our judgement and made us obsessive about rectifying records
storage and relaxed about professional forums.

Either way Graeme, I dare you to start a row about the continuum. Make it
really interesting and rope Mary in.

Daphne
------------------------------
From: Tom Chan
Sent: 30/09/2014 09:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The RM listserv, still?! - An international Perspective


Graeme

I am not unsympathetic to the issues that you raise. I live and work on a
small densely populated island in the Atlantic. There are quite a few
places to get training to keep your skills up to date but even here there
are some places that are either geographically or culturally isolated.



However Peter Kurilecz for the most part just posts rubbish. I used to be a
PeterK supporter a few years back but these days he just posts largely
useless promotional pieces for the library of somewhere or other which is
launching something or other. He puts zero care or curation into his posts.



While we are discussing 'an international perspective' it is worth
mentioning that Peter is an American. There is nothing wrong with that, a
fair few of my relatives are American. I visit America every quarter. I am
not in any way anti-American but [log in to unmask] is a
British based list. Some of Peter’s posts are culturally tone deaf, for
example he posts pro-Israel slanted news stories which is probably fine in
America but is quite divisive and contentious in the UK.



Tom

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:03:01 +0000
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The RM listserv, still?! - An international Perspective
To: [log in to unmask]

 I work as an Information Specialist in Tauranga, a provincial city in the
North Island of New Zealand.  Professional development for information
management  in New Zealand is (mostly) limited to two main centres,
Wellington and Auckland.



*IM Professional Development in New Zealand*

It is a seven hour drive (one hour flight) to Wellington, heart of
governmental recordkeeping, and a  three hour drive (a 40 minute flight)
from Auckland the heart of commercial recordkeeping, in New Zealand.
Invariably, any IM conferences, seminars, workshops, etc, are in either of
these two locations. This is improving with more events in provincial
centres, but mostly they are not easy to get to, and the bean counters
don’t like paying for airfares or accommodation.



We do have the NZ Records list server, but the Information and Records
Management Society mailing list brings in a wider range of information,
especially from Peter Kurilecz, some of which I pass on to the NZ records
list server.  Sometimes it has items about local information management
issues that are not on the local mailing list.  Occasionally, I’ll post
something from New Zealand to the IRMS mailing list, or to Peter, when I
think it will be of international interest.



*Mailing list vs Online portal or Work space*

I don’t want fancy, complicated access to information if a simple option is
readily available.  I can quickly read the mailing list email subject lines
and delete ones I don’t want to read.  Embedded links make it  easy to
access and read online items and If I want to save a link, I can click and
drag the email into a Reference folder in our EDRMS, or forward it to NZ
Records.



As we say over here, the IRMS mailing list is sweet, bro !





*Graeme Thompson*  |  MLIS  | Records Management Specialist
Tauranga City Council  | 07 577 7200 | Internal ext. 7623 | Mobile
021-032-7550 | [log in to unmask] | www.tauranga.govt.nz











*From:* The Information and Records Management Society mailing list [mailto:
[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Jen Parker
*Sent:* Saturday, 27 September 2014 3:53 a.m.
*To:* [log in to unmask]
*Subject:* Re: The RM listserv, still?!



Exactly.

Let us find the gumption to retire the listserv once and for all.



I think the administrators simply owe it to people, especially those
entering the profession, to do things better and move things forwards.



Jen





On 26 September 2014 16:36, Nicholas Cooper <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Arguably IRMSpace never got going because of the RM Listserv.
One was active whilst the other struggled to gain traction.
It was proposed that the Listserv be retired to allow the IRMSpace to
flourish (or rather force migration to the more modern platform). This was
not allowed to happen so IRMSpace never gained widespread adoption.
Arguably, again, while Listserv remains other initiative will most likely
suffer the same fate.

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange
 ------------------------------

*From: *Meic Pierce Owen <[log in to unmask]>

*Sender: *The Information and Records Management Society mailing list <
[log in to unmask]>

*Date: *Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:00:35 +0000

*To: *<[log in to unmask]>

*ReplyTo: *Meic Pierce Owen <[log in to unmask]>

*Subject: *Re: The RM listserv, still?!



I personally have a lot of empathy with what you say Jen yet when we at
IRMS ran a live Facebook equivalent site, Irmspace, it simply did not
bubble.

Meic



*From:* Jen Parker [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
*Sent:* 26 September 2014 15:58
*To:* Meic Pierce Owen
*Cc:* [log in to unmask]
*Subject:* Re: The RM listserv, still?!



"There are indeed many ways we *could* be having these discussions (from a
technological perspective) yet we appear to be, within the context of our
busy work lives, most comfortable with that which requires least effort."



Yes. Embarrassing, isn't it. Shameful, even. 'We' (not me) prefer to just
let it drip in, and look busy deleting the things.
A blog wd certainly suit those who otherwise use the listserv to reach
their captive audience.



I don't think it's "time" that stops these other platforms being
successful. (especially given how much time is lost reading and deleting
emails!). Look at how much time (most) ppl spend talkign to ppl on
Facebook. They need to be smarter, more responsive, more intuitive (wow, it
feels like i'm talking about DM software all over again).

A good collaboration platform (amongst other things) lets you start and
have conversations in real time (just like Facebook does) and keeps you
switched on to all the content that you want (e.g following conversations
etc).  Then one cd actively opt in or out of those umpteen training
adverts, course reminders and retention queries; which wd be formatted in
such a way as to make them really helpful. (cos you tag them, and then
search for them again, just like you use tags in Twitter). Email filters
incidentally are not a decent solution to good content curation! they are
the best-that-we-can-do-right-now. Ppl do log in when they know that it's
dynamic and current,  and they will pay for subscription if the service
works for them, and give them quality curated professional content.
Advertsing cd surely fund it?


New people entering this profession all the time, they must surely laugh at
how we're running the show.

Sorry, but it makes me despair.


Jen







On 26 September 2014 08:55, Meic Pierce Owen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Jen



Interesting post and a very fair point.



However, in defence of ‘the listserve’ what we, and other organisations
have found, is that it is not that easy to sustain activity on any platform
that requires individuals to make a conscious decision to go there.



We at IRMS found that with our irmspace professional discussion and
networking site and other sibling organisations have found the same.
Indeed, groups using the UK public sector Knowledge Hub have also found the
same. The ‘problem’ seems to be that whilst these platforms do well
initially,  most of us simply do not have the time to routinely log-on to
additional platforms whilst the listserve approach sits quite happily
within our already up and running email.



That is not to say that these platforms are not worth re-visiting.  IRMS
launched a discussion forum a year ago now and this has proven very
valuable as a platform for internal discussions.  It has not, however,
proven popular with the profession.  We are looking at reviewing the
reasons for this with a view to making any functionality changes that might
help uptake and then relaunching the platform thereafter.



So, whilst I agree with you, I think what we are currently seeing is
something rather interesting.  There are indeed many ways we *could* be
having these discussions (from a technological perspective) yet we appear
to be, within the context of our busy work lives, most comfortable with
that which requires least effort.



Regards



Meic



Meic Pierce Owen

IRMS Chair







*From:* The Information and Records Management Society mailing list [mailto:
[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Jen Parker
*Sent:* 25 September 2014 18:29
*To:* [log in to unmask]
*Subject:* The RM listserv, still?!



Does anyone else see the irony in Records Managers using the RM listserv,
still - in 2014?



With its sheer inability to filter the content, or preserve the really good
stuff posted here - for posterity.



It beggars belief, non?



So much better software we must have to pick from. There are so many better
ways to present and preserve this content, and manage our respective wheat
to chaff ratios.



The emails are frankly out of control.



Us , of all people...


Jen Parker

RM practitioner, of sorts.


(I think it's really time I just opted to unsubscribe..)

To view the list archives go to:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To
unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with
the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re
JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries,
please email [log in to unmask]

Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing quality of life -
Making best use of public resources. The information in this email is
solely for the intended recipients. If you are not an intended recipient,
you must not disclose, copy, or distribute its contents or use them in any
way: please advise the sender immediately and delete this email. Perth &
Kinross Council, Live Active Leisure Limited and TACTRAN do not warrant
that this email or any attachments are virus-free and does not accept any
liability for any loss or damage resulting from any virus infection. Perth
& Kinross Council may monitor or examine any emails received by its email
system. The information contained in this email may not be the views of
Perth & Kinross Council, Live Active Leisure Limited or TACTRAN. It is
possible for email to be falsified and the sender cannot be held
responsible for the integrity of the information contained in it. Requests
to Perth & Kinross Council under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act
should be directed to the Freedom of Information Team - email:
[log in to unmask] General enquiries to Perth & Kinross Council should be made
to [log in to unmask] or 01738 475000. General enquiries to Live Active
Leisure Limited should be made to [log in to unmask] or 01738
454600. General enquiries to TACTRAN should be made to [log in to unmask]
or 01738 475775. Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing
quality of life - Making best use of public resources.



Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing quality of life -
Making best use of public resources. The information in this email is
solely for the intended recipients. If you are not an intended recipient,
you must not disclose, copy, or distribute its contents or use them in any
way: please advise the sender immediately and delete this email. Perth &
Kinross Council, Live Active Leisure Limited and TACTRAN do not warrant
that this email or any attachments are virus-free and does not accept any
liability for any loss or damage resulting from any virus infection. Perth
& Kinross Council may monitor or examine any emails received by its email
system. The information contained in this email may not be the views of
Perth & Kinross Council, Live Active Leisure Limited or TACTRAN. It is
possible for email to be falsified and the sender cannot be held
responsible for the integrity of the information contained in it. Requests
to Perth & Kinross Council under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act
should be directed to the Freedom of Information Team - email:
[log in to unmask] General enquiries to Perth & Kinross Council should be made
to [log in to unmask] or 01738 475000. General enquiries to Live Active
Leisure Limited should be made to [log in to unmask] or 01738
454600. General enquiries to TACTRAN should be made to [log in to unmask]
or 01738 475775. Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing
quality of life - Making best use of public resources. To view the list
archives go to:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To
unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with
the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re
JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries,
please email [log in to unmask] To view the list
archives go to:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To
unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with
the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re
JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries,
please email [log in to unmask]



To view the list archives go to:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To
unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with
the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re
JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries,
please email [log in to unmask]
 The contents of this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be
privileged and/or subject to copyright.  Unauthorised use, distribution or
copying of the contents is expressly prohibited.  If you are not the
intended recipient, notify the sender immediately, delete the email and
attachments and all copies from your system, and do not use, read,
distribute, disclose or copy its contents.  Violation of this notice may be
unlawful.  Views expressed in this e-mail and attachments are those of the
author, and not necessarily those of Tauranga City Council.  Tauranga City
Council does not accept liability for any loss, damage or consequence
arising from this email and/or attachments containing any virus, defect,
data corruption or transmission error.
This email has been scrubbed for your protection by SMX. For more
information visit smxemail.com
 To view the list archives go to:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To
unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with
the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re
JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries,
please email [log in to unmask]
 To view the list archives go to:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To
unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with
the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re
JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries,
please email [log in to unmask]

To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask]
For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]