Print

Print


Thank you Jayne, Nick, Mike, Val, Sarah and Pete for your e-mails adding to the discussion. It certainly has got me thinking and I'm sure I'm not alone.
 
all the best
 
Sarah
 
 
 
Sarah MacLean
Heritage Information Partnerships Supervisor
English Heritage
 


From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Insole
Sent: 22 September 2014 14:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

As you are all probably aware we take a very wiki approach to our data that has proved very fruitful.

We have many records that have been improved/enhanced by members of the public using the public comment function on Know Your Place. This can be in terms of location information (most commonly) or occasionally the descriptions or references.

 

At the end of the day we decided that to know and publish something of historical interest about a place is enough to justify and trigger something like a DBA request through the planning process thereby enhancing the record in the long run.

 

Ever the optimist,

 

Peter Insole

Principal Historic Environment Officer

City Design Group (Urban Design and Conservation)

Place

Bristol City Council

Brunel House

St.Georges Road

Bristol, BS1 5UY

www.bristol.gov.uk/citydesigngroup

www.bristol.gov.uk/knowyourplace

Tel: 0117 9223033

Fax: 0117 9224637

This e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organisation to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed (including those contained within any attachments) represent an informal opinion of an officer of the City Council and are not binding on the Local Planning Authority. If you are not the intended recipient and you have received this e-mail in error you must take no action based on it. Please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately.

 

 

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw
Sent: 22 September 2014 12:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

 

I do on occasions try to indicate that a particular source or interpretation is unreliable

e.g. for Walsall medieval town:

‘Early accounts of the town include Willmore(20) and Homeshaw (21) though both contain errors and have been largely replaced by Pugh (3). Willmore's claim that there was a defence around Church Hill is mere speculation at the moment and his convoluted attempt to back this up by claiming Ablewell Street as a Norman French word meaning old wall is far fetched. (22)  The truth is more prosaic - a well called Able Well at the junction of Ablewell Street and Rushall Street is mentioned in the late 14th century. (23)’

 

If I just left these references out I know they would be constantly quoted back at me as most people seem to regard these Victorian sources as sacrosanct.

 

Mike

 

 Mike Shaw

Archaeologist, Education & Enterprise

Tel. Office: 01902 555493

 

E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Wolverhampton City Council

 

 

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sarah Orr
Sent: 22 September 2014 11:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

 

I think this a really good debate as to quite what our role is or should be – the ‘evidence base’ (presumably to be considered relatively reliable) or the ‘index’ (to all, good, bad or indifferent).  Like Nick I do add source references as and when I hear about them, though when creating a source record I add a note if I’ve not actually seen that book, article, map, etc.  Does this add some level of (in)validation?  Well there are lots of books and journals that we do have in our library which are HER sources and which I haven’t read that thoroughly, and anyway it would be impossible to be expert on everything (Mike’s point about someone with more specialist knowledge providing corrections is a very good one).  There have been a few past examples of developer-funded reports which have been considered so bad by the planning archaeologist that they haven’t been handed over to be added to the HER – but should I have entered them anyway?  I do screen out particularly crummy HER records from going online – Val’s desire about wanting it to make sense definitely strikes a chord – but when running an HER search on a particular area I try to correct any glaring mistakes, or at least make all entries intelligible.

 

To broaden this out philosophically, where do HER staff feel they fit into the pyramid model of data, information, knowledge and ..wisdom? eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DIKW-diagram.png

 

 

Best wishes

Sarah Orr
Historic Environment Record Officer
Culture and Environmental Protection  West Berkshire Council  Market Street  Newbury  RG14 5LD

(01635) 519805 | Ext 2805 | [log in to unmask]

http://info.westberks.gov.uk/HER

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Val Turner
Sent: 22 September 2014 10:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

 

That’s interesting as that’s what I’ve been doing – nothing on line because I want it to make sense when it does – but now I’m checking the key things and am planning to release data in batches, as fundamentals eg: grid ref and short description are checked, having realised that I was never going to get the time to polish it to the extent that would satisfy me

Val

 

Dr Val Turner
Shetland Archaeologist

Shetland Amenity Trust, Garthspool,
Lerwick, Shetland, ZE1 0NY
Tel: (01595) 694688

The Shetland Amenity Trust is a registered
Scottish charity, No: SC017505

 

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw
Sent: 19 September 2014 17:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

 

Yes I spent years saying I didn’t want to put my data on the web until it was all checked and sorted but was eventually persuaded that this was never going to happen and that it was better to put it out there, with the added benefit that it might encourage someone with specialist knowledge of a particular area to get in touch and provide additional information or correct any glaring omissions/errors etc.

 

Mike

 

Mike Shaw

Archaeologist, Education & Enterprise

Tel. Office: 01902 555493

 

E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Wolverhampton City Council

 

 

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nick Boldrini
Sent: 19 September 2014 16:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

 

My approach to data has changed over the years – when I first started I wanted it all to be neat and pretty before we shared. Then I realised how much work there was to be done before that would happen, so decided it’s best to just share it, warts and all.

 

I think our job is to point to information, index it to help people pick through it for themselves, and generally help people navigate through the increasingly complex information landscape so they can get the information they want. It’s up to them to decide how much credence they give it. In that sense I think we should act more like librarians than editors. We shouldn’t be deciding if the data is good or bad, just helping to make it available. All books get indexed in libraries, not just the good ones. So share regardless.

 

There is loads of information and data for all sites, not just buildings – so often my first approach is to link it to the record as a source – and worry about extracting the information to update the HER later. At least that way if someone wants to find out more they can – even if it does mean the HER record is a little out of date, and indexing for complex queries may not be as fine grained as we might ideally like.

 

I realise this means that in some sense this is potentially storing up problems for my successors that I curse my predecessors for (Why didn’t they index in more detail x site, report etc.) but generally I try and avoid the mistakes I’ve cursed (egg partial references which made sense at the time, but whose meaning now is lost/hard to decipher) – but you do the best with what you’ve got.

 

I’m of the opinion that if the HER’s in a better condition at the end of the week than it was at the start of it, it’s been a good week

 

Best wishes

 

Nick Boldrini

Historic Environment Record Officer

Ext 267008

 

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of MacLean, Sarah
Sent: 19 September 2014 14:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MASSMAIL]Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER enhancements

 

Ah it truly is Friday :) Thank you for all the entertaining puns.

 

Thank you Rob, Pete, Jason and Sheena for all the information you shared. Clearly there are some very specialised projects going on!

 

Jason you make some very interesting comments about quality of the data and the volume of data that could be put into the HER.

 

So throwing this out to everyone (although we're going slightly off topic here and I don't want to start any arguements!) 

- does quality of your data prevent you from sharing or do you share with caveats?

- Do you encourage people to use the HER datasets regardless of quality issues?

- Does the sheer volume of data available for some types of buildings or for some areas make it more difficult to integrate it into the HER?

 

all the best

 

Sarah


This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed may not necessarily represent those of West Berkshire Council.

If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this e-mail in error.

All communication sent to or from West Berkshire Council may be subject to recording and or monitoring in accordance with UK legislation, are subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and may therefore be disclosed to a third party on request.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This email and any enclosures are intended solely for the use of the named recipient. If this email has a protective marking of PROTECT or RESTRICT in its title or contents, the information within must be subject to appropriate safeguards to protect against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss or destruction or damage. PROTECT and RESTRICTED information should only be further shared where there is a legitimate need.
If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, distribute or use it without the authorisation of Wolverhampton City Council. If you have received this email in error please notify us by email to [log in to unmask] and then delete it and any attachments accompanying it. 
Please note that Wolverhampton City Council do not guarantee that this message or attachments are virus free or reach you in their original form and accept no liability arising from this. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are those of the writer and may not necessarily reflect those of Wolverhampton City Council. No contractual commitment is intended to arise from this email or attachments.
==============================================================================

Council services online: http://www.bristol.gov.uk/service

Keep up to date with the latest council news and sign up to our monthly email newsletter: http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ournews

Have your say on consultations and view our webcasts: http://www.bristol.gov.uk/consult

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.

Portico: your gateway to information on sites in the National Heritage Collection; have a look and tell us what you think.
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/archives-and-collections/portico/