As
you are all probably aware we take a very wiki approach to our data that has
proved very fruitful.
We
have many records that have been improved/enhanced by members of the public
using the public comment function on Know Your Place. This can be in terms of
location information (most commonly) or occasionally the descriptions or
references.
At
the end of the day we decided that to know and publish something of historical
interest about a place is enough to justify and trigger something like a DBA
request through the planning process thereby enhancing the record in the long
run.
Ever
the optimist,
Peter
Insole
Principal
Historic Environment Officer
City
Design Group (Urban Design and Conservation)
Place
Bristol
City Council
Brunel
House
St.Georges
Road
Bristol,
BS1 5UY
www.bristol.gov.uk/citydesigngroup
www.bristol.gov.uk/knowyourplace
Tel:
0117 9223033
Fax:
0117 9224637
This
e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s)
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed
(including those contained within any attachments) represent an informal opinion
of an officer of the City Council and are not binding on the Local Planning
Authority. If you are not the intended recipient and you have received this
e-mail in error you must take no action based on it. Please delete/destroy and
inform the sender immediately.
From: Issues
related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Mike Shaw
Sent: 22 September 2014 12:40
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER
enhancements
I
do on occasions try to indicate that a particular source or interpretation is
unreliable
e.g.
for Walsall medieval town:
‘Early
accounts of the town include Willmore(20) and Homeshaw (21) though both contain
errors and have been largely replaced by Pugh (3). Willmore's claim that there
was a defence around Church Hill is mere speculation at the moment and his
convoluted attempt to back this up by claiming Ablewell Street as a Norman
French word meaning old wall is far fetched. (22) The truth is more
prosaic - a well called Able Well at the junction of Ablewell Street and Rushall
Street is mentioned in the late 14th century. (23)’
If
I just left these references out I know they would be constantly quoted back at
me as most people seem to regard these Victorian sources as
sacrosanct.
Mike
Mike
Shaw
Archaeologist, Education
& Enterprise
Tel. Office: 01902
555493
Wolverhampton City
Council
From: Issues
related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Sarah Orr
Sent: 22 September 2014 11:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER
enhancements
I
think this a really good debate as to quite what our role is or should be – the
‘evidence base’ (presumably to be considered relatively reliable) or the ‘index’
(to all, good, bad or indifferent). Like Nick I do add source references
as and when I hear about them, though when creating a source record I add a note
if I’ve not actually seen that book, article, map, etc. Does this add some
level of (in)validation? Well there are lots of books and journals that we
do have in our library which are HER sources and which I haven’t read that
thoroughly, and anyway it would be impossible to be expert on everything (Mike’s
point about someone with more specialist knowledge providing corrections is a
very good one). There have been a few past examples of developer-funded
reports which have been considered so bad by the planning archaeologist that
they haven’t been handed over to be added to the HER – but should I have entered
them anyway? I do screen out particularly crummy HER records from going
online – Val’s desire about wanting it to make sense definitely strikes a chord
– but when running an HER search on a particular area I try to correct any
glaring mistakes, or at least make all entries
intelligible.
To
broaden this out philosophically, where do HER staff feel they fit into the
pyramid model of data, information, knowledge and ..wisdom? eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DIKW-diagram.png
Best
wishes
Sarah
Orr
Historic Environment Record Officer
Culture
and Environmental Protection West Berkshire Council Market Street
Newbury RG14 5LD
(01635)
519805 | Ext 2805 | [log in to unmask]
http://info.westberks.gov.uk/HER
From: Issues
related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Val Turner
Sent: 22 September 2014 10:07
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER
enhancements
That’s interesting as
that’s what I’ve been doing – nothing on line because I want it to make sense
when it does – but now I’m checking the key things and am planning to release
data in batches, as fundamentals eg: grid ref and short description are checked,
having realised that I was never going to get the time to polish it to the
extent that would satisfy me
Val
Dr
Val Turner |
|
From: Issues
related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Mike Shaw
Sent: 19 September 2014 17:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER
enhancements
Yes
I spent years saying I didn’t want to put my data on the web until it was all
checked and sorted but was eventually persuaded that this was never going to
happen and that it was better to put it out there, with the added benefit that
it might encourage someone with specialist knowledge of a particular area to get
in touch and provide additional information or correct any glaring
omissions/errors etc.
Mike
Mike
Shaw
Archaeologist, Education
& Enterprise
Tel. Office: 01902
555493
Wolverhampton City
Council
From: Issues
related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Nick Boldrini
Sent: 19 September 2014
16:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER
enhancements
My
approach to data has changed over the years – when I first started I wanted it
all to be neat and pretty before we shared. Then I realised how much work there
was to be done before that would happen, so decided it’s best to just share it,
warts and all.
I
think our job is to point to information, index it to help people pick through
it for themselves, and generally help people navigate through the increasingly
complex information landscape so they can get the information they want. It’s up
to them to decide how much credence they give it. In that sense I think we
should act more like librarians than editors. We shouldn’t be deciding if the
data is good or bad, just helping to make it available. All books get indexed in
libraries, not just the good ones. So share regardless.
There
is loads of information and data for all sites, not just buildings – so
often my first approach is to link it to the record as a source – and worry
about extracting the information to update the HER later. At least that way if
someone wants to find out more they can – even if it does mean the HER record is
a little out of date, and indexing for complex queries may not be as fine
grained as we might ideally like.
I
realise this means that in some sense this is potentially storing up problems
for my successors that I curse my predecessors for (Why didn’t they index in
more detail x site, report etc.) but generally I try and avoid the mistakes I’ve
cursed (egg partial references which made sense at the time, but whose meaning
now is lost/hard to decipher) – but you do the best with what you’ve
got.
I’m
of the opinion that if the HER’s in a better condition at the end of the week
than it was at the start of it, it’s been a good week
Best
wishes
Nick
Boldrini
Historic
Environment Record Officer
Ext
267008
From: Issues
related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of MacLean, Sarah
Sent: 19 September 2014
14:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:
[MASSMAIL]Re: Historic Buildings/Structures HER
enhancements
Ah it
truly is Friday :) Thank you for all the entertaining
puns.
Thank
you Rob, Pete, Jason and Sheena for all the information you shared. Clearly
there are some very specialised projects going on!
Jason
you make some very interesting comments about quality of the data and the volume
of data that could be put into the HER.
So
throwing this out to everyone (although we're going slightly off topic here
and I don't want to start any arguements!)
- does
quality of your data prevent you from sharing or do you share with caveats?
- Do
you encourage people to use the HER datasets regardless of quality issues?
- Does
the sheer volume of data available for some types of buildings or for some areas
make it more difficult to integrate it into the HER?
all
the best
Sarah
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
views or opinions expressed may not necessarily represent those of West
Berkshire Council.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to
anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this e-mail
in error.
All communication sent to or from West Berkshire Council may
be subject to recording and or monitoring in accordance with UK legislation, are
subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and may
therefore be disclosed to a third party on request.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This email and any enclosures are intended solely for the use of the named recipient. If this email has a protective marking of PROTECT or RESTRICT in its title or contents, the information within must be subject to appropriate safeguards to protect against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss or destruction or damage. PROTECT and RESTRICTED information should only be further shared where there is a legitimate need.
If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, distribute or use it without the authorisation of Wolverhampton City Council. If you have received this email in error please notify us by email to [log in to unmask] and then delete it and any attachments accompanying it.
Please note that Wolverhampton City Council do not guarantee that this message or attachments are virus free or reach you in their original form and accept no liability arising from this. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are those of the writer and may not necessarily reflect those of Wolverhampton City Council. No contractual commitment is intended to arise from this email or attachments.
==============================================================================