 |
 |
please do include my email in the discussion best federico On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Khashan, Ali <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I would like to be copied in as well. I am surprised that Gaza is > considered to have been "stable" before June2014 despite the fact Gaza has > been under siege and still under illegal occupation since 1967! > Ali > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 6 Aug 2014, at 19:33, "ifty k" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > i would also like this copied in to me as i suspect would others, > though id also like the option to avoid Mr granville's emails, if that were > possible > thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 6 Aug 2014, at 17:02, "Deo Ramprakash" < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I would like to have this discussion copied to me please. > > Deo Ramprakash > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Murray Pollock <[log in to unmask]> > To: allstat <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:00 > Subject: Re: Israeli public opinion > > > John et al. > > This is a public mailing list. Is it entirely necessary to copy everyone > into your conversation? I have no problem with the initial question, but > perhaps interested parties could respond to you and you respond to them > without cc'ing me in... > > Murray > > On 6 Aug 2014, at 15:54, John Bibby <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I should have used the term 'non-Jew'. (I believe the overwhelming > majority are Palestinian.) My point is that non-Jews seem not to have been > surveyed at all, yet the results have been used as representative of > Israeli opinion. > > Depending on whether you use 1948, 1967 or 2010 borders, the proportion > of non-Jews can be up to or even over 50% I believe (But as I said before, > I may be wrong - that was why I asked the question.) > > JOHN BIBBY > > > > where are the non-Jewish respondents? > > > On 6 August 2014 11:09, Michael Baxter <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> What is the problem? I regularly analyse surveys in the UK where >> respondents are analysed by ethnicity and sex. In both cases, the >> respondents are classified in accordance with their own self-description. >> The same is done in the USA. I assume that Israeli surveys also work like >> that. >> >> Michael Baxter >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:00:22 +0200 >> Subject: Re: Israeli public opinion >> From: [log in to unmask] >> To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] >> >> >> Does your answer imply that Israeli IDs are mentioning ethnical/religious >> information about Israeli citizens? This (besides the moral ones) raises a >> number of technical issues: what about secular Arabs/Jews? About children >> from mixed couples? How do they classify a Christian “ethnical (BTW, what >> does that mean?) Jew”? >> >> The very meaning of a "Jewish sample" versus a "non-Jewish" one looks >> quite suspicious and the source of huge selection bias! >> >> M. Hallin. >> >> You may leave the list at any time by sending the command >> SIGNOFF allstat >> to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank. >> > > You may leave the list at any time by sending the command > SIGNOFF allstat > to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank. > > > You may leave the list at any time by sending the command > SIGNOFF allstat > to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank. > You may leave the list at any time by sending the command > > SIGNOFF allstat > > to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank. > > You may leave the list at any time by sending the command > > SIGNOFF allstat > > to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank. > > You may leave the list at any time by sending the command > > SIGNOFF allstat > > to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank. > -- Federico Crudu https://sites.google.com/site/federicocrudu/ You may leave the list at any time by sending the command SIGNOFF allstat to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.