 |
 |
Please see responses seriatim On Jul 9, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > 1. If this list is, or could be expanded to be, a general list of > vocabularies, do we need the term "RDF" in the title? (Even though > many of the entries will be at least partly represented in RDF.) +1 on removing RDF from the title > 2. Would you be willing to help us populate this list with more links > to resources, standards, ontologies and other authorities? yes > 3. If you think this would be useful (and the appropriate venue) would > you like to add sections and structure to this document that you would > like to see populated with more vocabularies, even if you do not know > what they are yet? (I have started this task with a couple of lists of > kinds of vocabulary I think would be useful—text and object data > [category, material, object type], and person data [occupations, > relationships].) yes Tom Elliott, Ph.D. Associate Director for Digital Programs and Senior Research Scholar Institute for the Study of the Ancient World (NYU) http://isaw.nyu.edu/people/staff/tom-elliott