Hi Torben,


Thank you for your suggestion. I think it is a good compromise because in this case for example, 1 3 5  which should be offset by zero (because its acquired simultaneously) but will be offset by TR/15 (using default SPM). Indeed for TRs < 1s, this would be negligible. 


Cheers,


Rajat




Rajat Mani Thomas
Social Brain Lab
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
Amsterdam
From: Torben Lund <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 02 June 2014 11:48
To: Rajat Thomas
Cc: spm Parametric Mapping)
Subject: Re: [SPM] Multiband Slice timing
 
Hi Rajat

This is a wild guess which I have not testet, but have you tried a sliceorder vector which reflects the situation e.g. with 15 slices and multislice acceleration of 3 [1 3 5 2 4 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 5 2 4 ]

Best
Torben


Torben Ellegaard Lund
Associate Professor, PhD
Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN)
Aarhus University
Aarhus University Hospital
Building 10G, 5th floor, room 31
Noerrebrogade 44
8000 Aarhus C
Denmark
Phone: +45 7846 4380
Fax: +45 7846 4400
http://www.cfin.au.dk
[log in to unmask]





Den Uge:23 02/06/2014 kl. 11.08 skrev Rajat Thomas <[log in to unmask]>:

​Dear SPMers,

Any suggestion on how to perform multiband slice timing in SPM?

Thanks.

Rajat



Rajat Mani Thomas
Social Brain Lab
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
Amsterdam