 |
 |
Hi, On 23 May 2014 10:47, Adam Huffman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Jensen, Jens (STFC,RAL,SC) > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> This sounds very sensible. Someone suggested somewhere that writing code >> and publishing it even counts as a publication, and could be referenced >> with a DOI or something. If in the Glorious Future(tm) all data >> associated with a publication is published, so should be the codes used >> to analyse it, so people can verify the results. It was even suggested >> that software be peer reviewed. >> >> Apologies for being vague in the attributions; I genuinely cannot >> remember where the idea came from - I don't think it was one of my own. >> > > I feel obliged to mention that these ideas have been around in other > disciplines (e.g. Life Sciences, where I was for 12 years before > coming to Imperial) for a long time... > > E.G. http://f1000research.com/about plus many others > And in physics too (my old discipline of Condensed Matter physics, for example, has cited software going back at least a decade). Sam > > Cheers, > Adam