 |
 |
Here's the link to our University of Wolverhampton guidelines: http://www.wlv.ac.uk/default.aspx?page=32434 Best, Carol Carol Bailey Senior Lecturer in English for Academic Purposes Co-ordinator: Postgraduate Academic English Language Development University of Wolverhampton Staff profile<http://www.wlv.ac.uk/default.aspx?page=15574> From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Erik Borg Sent: 30 April 2014 14:43 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Best practices for the interpretation of originality reports with Turnitin & iThenticate Along with following Diane Schmitt's recommendations, I think this is an excellent idea. Lecturers and students don't understand the reports, and, as Diane suggested, Turnitin focuses on the plagiarism of words and not the dissemination and proper reuse of ideas. Emma Duke-Williams described students saying "what's an acceptable %?" but my students from across the university report lecturers saying "Your paper must be below X%" similarity." Lecturers feel when faced with a stack of marking, "I don't really understand similarity reports, and what's the point of Turnitin if I have to crawl through each report? Faced with the student survey that's cutting my marking time, how does it help me increase my speed of marking?" So they give a simple, arbitrary number. In my experience, 17% is pretty common. Best wishes, Erik Borg Coventry University From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amanda McKenzie Sent: 30 April 2014 14:07 To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: Best practices for the interpretation of originality reports with Turnitin & iThenticate Hello, I have been reading your recent strings on Turnitin and I was hoping that you could help me. In the near future I will be pulling together a working group at Waterloo to develop best practices for the interpretation of originality reports with Turnitin & iThenticate. To date, I have been unable to find a lot of information on this process, and I wondered if any other institutions have developed their own guidelines for the interpretation of these reports. I'd appreciate any insights you may have. Thank you! Regards, Amanda McKenzie Office of Academic Integrity Office of the Associate Provost, Resources 519-888-4567 x38562 [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> www.academicintegrity.uwaterloo.ca<http://www.academicintegrity.uwaterloo.ca/> [cid:image001.png@01CF69DE.691F0310] [cid:image002.png@01CF69DE.691F0310] ************************************************************************* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html ************************************************************************* MODERN UNIVERSITY OF THE YEAR 2014 Source: The Times and The Sunday Times Good University Guide 2014 NOTICE This message and any files transmitted with it is intended for the addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee. Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Coventry University. ************************************************************************* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html ************************************************************************* -- Scanned by iCritical. ************************************************************************* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html *************************************************************************