I agree that association is a better description than college.


Sent from Samsung Mobile


-------- Original message --------
From: thelmajameson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:06/05/2014 14:34 (GMT+00:00)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] Fwd: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] The name of a new single organisation for occupational health - survey to end on Friday

Yes , i also agree that Association is better than College.

Thelma


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II on Three


-------- Original message --------
From: Lyndsey Marchant <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
Date:06/05/2014 13:47 (GMT+00:00)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] The name of a new single organisation for occupational health - survey to end on Friday

I agree about the word college and gave said similar in the comments box

Sent from my iPhone

> On 6 May 2014, at 13:23, "SUE" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I have done the online survey but I don't like the name 'college', I think Association would be better. Not sure if you are counting these suggestions too.
>
> Sue
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karen Coomer" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] The name of a new single organisation for occupational health - survey to end on Friday
>
>
>> Hi everyone
>> 167 have responded to the question about a name for the new single
>> organisation, so far. I will close the survey at the end of play on Friday
>> so if you haven't responded and want a say then please take part by clicking
>> on the following link
>>
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/OHname
>>
>>
>> Many thanks, the response is a great example of how we can contribute to the
>> discussion about the future of an occupational health body that can
>> represent us.
>>
>> Regards
>> Karen
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Vanessa Hebditch
>> Sent: 06 May 2014 08:47
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] The name of a new single organisation for
>> occupational health - please let us know what you think
>>
>> Thanks for doing this Karen - really helpful.
>>
>> I am compiling comments on the name from all of the other sources and
>> feeding back the results/comments/issues raised to the Project team. Could
>> you let me know the results of the survey when you close it + all of the
>> comments and I will incorporate in my report.
>>
>>
>> Vanessa Hebditch
>> Communications
>>
>> Mobile 07899 895674
>>
>> Society of Occupational Medicine
>> Hamilton House, Mabledon Place, London WC1H 9BB Telephone 020 7554 8627
>> Facsimile 020 7554 8526
>>
>>
>>
>> www.som.org.uk
>> Registered Charity:268555
>> VAT no: 927 0030 57
>> ________________________________________
>> From: [log in to unmask] [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>> Karen Coomer [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 04 May 2014 08:51
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] The name of a new single organisation for
>> occupational health - please let us know what you think
>>
>> Good debate this - contribution to the survey is now 144 and 22 comments
>> about the word college.
>>
>> I found this out about the use of Royal - as Anne says it sounds like it has
>> to have a record of establishment and achievement
>>
>> There are in excess of 900 Chartered
>> Bodies<http://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/140
>> 326-Record-of-Charters-Granted.xls>. A Royal Charter is a way of
>> incorporating a body, that is turning it from a collection of individuals
>> into a single legal entity. A body incorporated by Royal Charter has all the
>> powers of a natural person, including the power to sue and be sued in its
>> own right. Royal Charters were at one time the only means of incorporating a
>> body, but there are now other means (becoming a registered company, for
>> example), so the grant of new Charters is comparatively rare. New grants of
>> Royal Charters are these days reserved for eminent professional bodies or
>> charities which have a solid record of achievement and are financially
>> sound. In the case of professional bodies they should represent a field of
>> activity which is unique and not covered by other professional bodies.
>> At least 75% of the corporate members should be qualified to first degree
>> level standard. Finally, both in the case of charities and professional
>> bodies, incorporation by Charter should be in the public interest.
>> This last consideration is important, since once incorporated by Royal
>> Charter a body surrenders significant aspects of the control of its internal
>> affairs to the Privy Council. Amendments to Charters can be made only with
>> the agreement of The Queen in Council, and amendments to the body's by-laws
>> require the approval of the Council (though not normally of Her Majesty).
>> This effectively means a significant degree of Government regulation of the
>> affairs of the body, and the Privy Council will therefore wish to be
>> satisfied that such regulation accords with public policy.
>> Regards
>> Karen
>>
>> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: 03 May 2014 11:54
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] The name of a new single organisation for
>> occupational health - please let us know what you think
>>
>> I think the term college has been considered as it follows the "Royal
>> College" approach as per:
>> Royal College of Surgeons;
>> Royal College of Physicians;
>> Royal College of GPs;
>> Royal College of Gynaecologists  etc.
>>
>> The term Royal reflects having a "Royal Charter" = not sure how that is
>> achieved but perhaps that can only be conferred once the institution has
>> been established.
>>
>> Anne
>> Anne Harriss
>> Course Director
>> LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY
>>
>>
>> On 03/05/2014 10:52, "Jane Mountain" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi Karen
>>
>> Yes, I agree... Doesn't sound right. OH yes , collage no.. My initial
>> thoughts
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jane.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 2 May 2014, at 13:18, Karen Coomer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 101 responses so far, College of Occupational Health is winning! Quite a few
>> comments so far on not liking the word 'College'
>>
>> Must make it clear that the names for the new single organisation in the
>> survey are not mine, they have been proposed to SOM and FOM. Link is below
>> if you want to contribute.
>>
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/OHname
>>
>> Thanks
>> Karen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Karen Coomer [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 May 2014 15:35
>> To: 'Occupational Health mailing list'
>> Subject: The name of a new single organisation for occupational health -
>> please let us know what you think
>>
>> Dear List
>>
>> As you know the potential for a single organisation representing a
>> multidisciplinary occupational health is moving along and could be reality
>> if FOM and SOM members vote  yes
>>
>>
>>
>> In preparation a name for the new organisation is currently being discussed
>> - I would love to hear the jisc members views on this so to collate
>> responses I have turned this question into a survey which I will collate and
>> report back as the favourite name.
>>
>>
>>
>> It will take 1 minute to answer  as there is only one question so to
>> participate please click on the following  link
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/OHname
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks
>>
>> Karen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.
>>
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.
>>
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>>
>> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.
>>
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>>
>> ********************************
>> Please remove this footer before replying.
>>
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>>
>> ********************************
>> Please remove this footer before replying.
>>
>> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>>
>> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> ********************************
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

********************************
Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

******************************** Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH