 |
 |
hello to All, I find the discussion is as provoking as it is interesting, and for hosts of reasons, BUT---, my main point in writing is to try to understand ethics and morality in a critical sense as an ontic object. I cannot as yet structure them into this form. Discursively and epistemicially, I perceive their sole presence as tacit, that is, a generic absence collective through non-engagement. Howsoever, I would really appreciate any offer, thoughts, or guidance on locating/pursuing ethical and moral objects. Thank you. Kind regards, Thomas On 14 May 2014 14:12, Candice Pamela Boyd <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I am very grateful to Dr Garrett for offering advice on the legality of > my own geographical fieldwork in the early stages of my PhD. I knowingly > and very deliberately engaged in illegal activity for the sake of > research. I think that Bradley's case is a provocative one in that it > demonstrates that ethical conduct has the potential to result in legal > action. It's a huge issue with which the geographical community - > particularly those of ethnographic persuasion - need to grapple. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* A forum for critical and radical geographers [ > [log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kelvin Mason [ > [log in to unmask]] > *Sent:* 14 May 2014 22:03 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* How should students deal with witnessing illegal activity > during fieldwork > > In response to Lars question, perhaps it’s worth bringing to the > attention of the whole list the case of Bradley Garrett who is currently in > court in the UK charged with, so I understand, ‘conspiracy to commit > criminal damage’. Some list members will already be aware of Brad’s work > and perhaps his legal case, but here’s a brief journalistic introduction to > both from Will Self > > > http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/will-self-give-the-freedom-of-the-city-to-our-urban-explorers-9286780.html > > > > >