 |
 |
16-May-2014 Dear Patrick, Proteopedia [http://proteopedia.org] uses exactly the same style for referencing published material. Proteopedia allows for the easy insertion of Pubmed and DOI references by only requesting from the user to enter the Pubmed or DOI ids. We have extended the same software used in Wikipedia for the internal Proteopedia engine to, based on this reference ID, retrieve, format and insert the correctly formatted reference at the bottom of the page. For example, type <ref>PMID 18673581</ref> or <ref>doi 10.1093/nar/gku213</ref> in the wikitext box and save the page. If you type the reference in this manner, the properly formatted reference will be created automatically at the bottom of the page (or wherever you place the necessary wikitext "<references/>"). See http://proteopedia.org/w/Help:Editing#Citing_Literature_References and Proteopedia pages for actual examples. best regards, Jaime & Joel On 15May, 2014, at 13:48, Patrick Shaw Stewart <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: I may be missing something here, but I don't think you have to rebut anything. You simply report that someone else has rebutted it. Along the lines of Many scientists regard this published structure as unreliable since a misconduct investigation by the University of Alabama at Birmingham has concluded that it was, "more likely than not", faked [1] [1] http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091222/full/462970a.html On 15 May 2014 18:00, Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Shaw Stewart <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: It seems to me that the Wikipedia mechanism works wonderfully well. One rule is that you can't make assertions yourself, only report pre-existing material that is attributable to a "reliable published source". This rule would be a little problematic for annotating the PDB. It requires a significant amount of effort to publish a peer-reviewed article or even just a letter to the editor, and none of us are being paid to write rebuttals to dodgy structures. -Nat -- [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Douglas Instruments Ltd. Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart http://www.douglas.co.uk<http://www.douglas.co.uk/> Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090 US toll-free 1-877-225-2034 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36