Print

Print


Certainly interesting to reread.  The title evokes Samuel Beckett's work with the same name & I wonder whether I should regard yours as a scenario or a prose poem, or both.  Can you imagine anyone filming it?

Barry


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:04:25 +0100, Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>*Film*
>
>a man opens a door in the side of his head; a little steam floats in the
>cavity; pipes within the skull shine patchily, clouded by condensation; a
>healthy-looking seagull on a patio; a small black ant walks across a table,
>examining bread crumbs; a helicopter is audible but not visible; the man
>closes the door soundlessly; he opens it again; Warning, he says, warning,
>the voice not quite synchronised with the movement of the jaw. Have some
>bread. Warning, he says, warning; the jaws make exactly the same simplistic
>movements as before. Have some bread; the jaws do not move at all; the
>seagull is looking at the observer sidewaysly; the door in the side of the
>head swings although there is no wind; a piece of cotton wool rolls across
>the patio; it is ignored by the gull after brief examination; the valley is
>full of flying birds; in the back of the swinging door is the garden in
>reverse, reflected. Warning, he says, warning, his voice croaky, his
>expression rigid; he stands erect, moving his angular arm stiffly to close
>his head once more; but its door starts to move jerkily on its silent
>hinges and his body fidgets; the arm and hand assembly take no account of
>this movement and seek to intersect the head door where it had been; only a
>faint mark of steam dissipating in that air remains and is immediately
>dispersed by the flailing fingers at the end of the misplaced hand and arm;
>the door closes and the fidgeting ceases, leaving the figure bent,
>distorted, in the act of completing an action which is incomprehensible to
>the observer, the observer having its own behavioural categories