Yes. Assuming that the contrast was [1 -1].

Best Regards, Donald McLaren
=================
D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and
Harvard Medical School
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren
Office: (773) 406-2464
=====================
This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED
HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773)
406-2464 or email.


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Sevel,Landrew S <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. 

Just to confirm, in this case then, the difference in means would be the con_image?

-Drew

From: <MCLAREN>, Donald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: "MCLAREN, Donald" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, March 24, 2014 10:12 AM
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [SPM] Paired t-test Effect Size

The effect size is the difference in means divided by the standard deviation.

The standard deviation is the the contrast (con_ image) divided by t-statistic (spmT_ image) times square root of N.  derived from t=M/(SD/square root of N)

Best Regards, Donald McLaren
=================
D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and
Harvard Medical School
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren
Office: (773) 406-2464
=====================
This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED
HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773)
406-2464 or email.


On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Sevel,Landrew S <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello all,

I'm interested in obtaining effect sizes to correspond to t-values for a repeated measures second level t-map. Is there a way to calculate an effect size from a group-level paired-samples t-test?

I know some approximations have been suggested for between-groups t-tests previously.

Thanks.

-Drew