 |
 |
_____list+curt+etcetcetc_____ ____i like this distinction__‹ ____what was its purpose/function supposed to be___ _but also, i like the sort of it is meant To be looked at/experienced ::: to me this is _________a quite important aspect of what we are _____discussing (or at least in my head)________ ___if we take away Œintent¹ and just look at/experience ___do we we get similar outcomes? _____sometimes we don¹t get/or don¹t know how/why/when/who _____that something is made and comes before us ______and sometimes in that moment we might take interest [!] ___we might find something there to consider ___like it was always already there performed existing _‹and if there is/isn¹t context for why/when/who/how ___can we still consider it in the same vein ___as what we already talk about Œartworks¹ Œart practices¹ ___my example for consideration are these two twitter accounts: One is from a site where visitors generate the message The other is from I don¹t know where/how for sure :::: https://twitter.com/9l17c_ https://twitter.com/crashtxt :::: One is user performed Other is Œsomething¹ performed I don¹t know where I¹m going or why, but just curiousŠ.. bill On 3/6/14, 10:38 AM, "Curt Cloninger" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >////////////////////////////////// > >The fact that it doesn't work is part of the design, not a defect. >It's supposed to work, by design; that's an essential part of the >concept. > >////////////////////////////////// > >Curt >