Right- it says:According to the html-side the 'visualisation' includes two
back-rotations in addition to what you copied here, so there is at
least one difference to the visualisation of the Eulerian angles.
"This can also be visualised asrotation κ about the new Z,
rotation ϕ about Z,
rotation ω about the new Y,
rotation (-ω) about the new Y,
rotation (-ϕ) about the new Z."
The first two and the last two rotations can be seen as a "wrapper" which
first transforms the coordinates so the rotation axis lies along z, then after
the actual kappa rotation is carried out (by rotation about z), transforms the rotated molecule back to the otherwise original position.
Or which transforms the coordinate system to put Z along the rotation axis, then after
the rotation by kappa about z transforms back to the original coordinate system.
Specifically,
rotation ϕ about Z brings the axis into the x-z plane so that
rotation ω about the Y brings the axis onto the z axis, so that
rotation κ about Z is doing the desired rotation about a line that passes through
the atoms in the same way the desired lmn axis did in the original orientation;
Then the 4'th and 5'th operations are the inverse of the 2nd and first,
bringing the rotated molecule back to its otherwise original position
I think all the emphasis on "new" y and "new" z is confusing. If we are rotating the molecule (coordinates), then the axes don't change. They pass through the molecule
in a different way because the molecule is rotated, but the axes are the same. After the first two rotations the Z axis passes along the desired rotation axis, but the Z axis has not moved, the coordinates (molecules) have.
Of course there is the alternate interpretation that we are doing a change of coordinates and expressing the unmoved molecular coordinates relative to new principle axes. but if we are rotating the coordinates about the axes then the axes should remain the same, shouldn't they? Or maybe there is yet another way of looking at it.
Tim Gruene wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear Qixu Cai,
maybe the confusion is due to that your quote seems incomplete.
According to the html-side the 'visualisation' includes two
back-rotations in addition to what you copied here, so there is at
least one difference to the visualisation of the Eulerian angles.
Best,
Tim
On 03/27/2014 07:11 AM, Qixu Cai wrote:
Dear all,
From the definition of CCP4
(http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/html/rotationmatrices.html), the polar angle
(ϕ, ω, κ) can be visualised as rotation ϕ about Z, rotation ω about
the new Y, rotation κ about the new Z. It seems the same as the ZXZ
convention of eulerian angle definition. What's the difference
between the CCP4 polar angle definition and eulerian angle ZXZ
definition?
And what's the definition of polar angle XYK convention in GLRF
program?
Thank you very much!
Best wishes,
- --
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen
GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFTNAz0UxlJ7aRr7hoRAj7IAKDs/J0L/XCYPpQSyB2BPJ2uWV2lVgCeKD72
0DemwU57v6fekF6iOC4/5IA=
=PeT9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----