Print

Print
Dear Yuko,

You may find the answer to your question in the following article:

Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 May 23.

False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.

Chumbley JR, Friston KJ.

Hope this helps,

Ella


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Yuko <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear SPM Experts,


I have a naive question about threshold.


In SPM5, I could set p<0.05 (FDR corrected) as a threshold. However, in SPM8, I couldn’t select this option. 


I found some scripts to show FDR option. However, I’m not sure whether FDR is good for correction in SPM8. Therefore, I would like to know the reason why SPM8 creators delated FDR option. 


Any suggestion will be highly appreciated.


Thanks in advance,

Yuko




--
Ella Gabitov
Ph.D. student
The E.J. Safra Brain Research Center for Learning Disabilities
The Laboratory of Human Brain and Learning
University of Haifa
Israel
Phone: +972-52-6722700
E-mail: [log in to unmask]