 |
 |
Dear Yuko, You may find the answer to your question in the following article: Neuroimage.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=False+discovery+rate+revisited%3A+FDR+and+topological+inference+using+Gaussian+random+fields#> 2009 Jan 1;44(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 May 23. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields. Chumbley JR<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Chumbley%20JR%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18603449> , Friston KJ<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Friston%20KJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18603449> . Hope this helps, Ella On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Yuko <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear SPM Experts, > > > I have a naive question about threshold. > > > In SPM5, I could set p<0.05 (FDR corrected) as a threshold. However, in > SPM8, I couldn’t select this option. > > > I found some scripts to show FDR option. However, I’m not sure whether FDR > is good for correction in SPM8. Therefore, I would like to know the reason > why SPM8 creators delated FDR option. > > > Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. > > > Thanks in advance, > > Yuko > -- Ella Gabitov Ph.D. student The E.J. Safra Brain Research Center for Learning Disabilities The Laboratory of Human Brain and Learning University of Haifa Israel Phone: +972-52-6722700 E-mail: [log in to unmask]