Dear McLaren, I saw the post of Sara and your response and I wonder if it's ok to extract eigenvariate by set a such threshold and to use it for other analyses such as correlations ? I mean, is it the fact that it's an a priori hypothesis that it's ok to set such threshold or is it the right and common method to use ? Regards, Alexandre Le 27/01/2014 19:36, MCLAREN, Donald a écrit : > Lower the threshold to .9999 > > Best Regards, Donald McLaren > ================= > D.G. McLaren, Ph.D. > Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General > Hospital and > Harvard Medical School > Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA > Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren > <http://www.martinos.org/%7Emclaren> > Office: (773) 406-2464 > ===================== > This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED > HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is > intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the > reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or > agent > responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged > information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking > of any > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail > unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at > (773) > 406-2464 or email. > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Sara Blaine <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > Hi, > If I want to make a VOI at a priori coordinates that do not have > suprathreshold activation at the VOI, how can I do this? > When I put my a priori voxels in it will not make a small volume > sphere and when I go to those coordinates and click on > eigenvariate, it jumps to the nearest VOI that is suprathreshold, > but is no longer in my region of interest. > > Thank you in advance for your help. > Sincerely, > Sara K. Blaine > >