 |
 |
Re: FutureLearn terms. *http://about.futurelearn.com/terms/ <http://about.futurelearn.com/terms/>6.3 Certain Partner Institutions may, at their own discretion, make available certain Online Content and Courses under a Creative Commons licence (non-Commercial). Should Partner Institutions choose to do this, it will be clearly identified on the appropriate Online Content and Courses page of the Website and we acknowledge that the Creative Commons licence will override certain of these terms and conditions as appropriate. A full copy of the relevant Creative Commons licence will be available from a link at that point.* It would be preferable if FutureLearn would remove the "NC" requirement. In other words, content contributors should be able to choose *any* CC license they elect to add to their course. They, the Copyright holders, the Universities, the Faculty, should not have their choices limited to only the NC licenses. Thoughts? Cable On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Suzanne Hardy <[log in to unmask] > wrote: > And also to reiterate, in my conversations so far, FutureLearn are in > fact very keen to work with more courses using open licenses. > > Any resistance to using open licensing has not come from the F/L team, > but from individual institutions. > > > -- > > Suzanne Hardy > Senior Project Officer > Quality in Learning and Teaching (QuILT) > Student and Academic Services > Ground Floor, North Wing > King George VI Building > Newcastle University > Newcastle upon Tyne > NE1 7RU > > Tel: 0191 208 3967 > http://www.ncl.ac.uk/quilt > > email: [log in to unmask] > mobile: 07790 905657 > skype: glitt3rgirl > https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/suzannehardy/ > > OER14: building communities of open practice > 28 & 29 April 2014, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK > www.oer14.org > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Jan 2014, at 20:43, Ebba Ossiannilsson <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > Just to agree with Suzanne > But sure MOOCs needs more CC material > By the way just started teh course, so it will be of interest to follow > Best Ebba Ossiannilsson, Lund University, Sweden > > > ------------------------------ > *Från:* Open Educational Resources [[log in to unmask]] för > Suzanne Hardy [[log in to unmask]] > *Skickat:* den 6 januari 2014 16:32 > *Till:* [log in to unmask] > *Ämne:* Re: OERs and MOOCS > > My interactions so far with FutureLearn regarding OER have all been > positive. > > It is worth remembering that individual partners decide on whether or > not to make their courses/resources OER, rather than a FutureLearn top down > requirement to CC license everything. > > > -- > > Suzanne Hardy > Senior Project Officer > Quality in Learning and Teaching (QuILT) > Student and Academic Services > Ground Floor, North Wing > King George VI Building > Newcastle University > Newcastle upon Tyne > NE1 7RU > > Tel: 0191 208 3967 > http://www.ncl.ac.uk/quilt > > email: [log in to unmask] > mobile: 07790 905657 > skype: glitt3rgirl > https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/suzannehardy/ > > OER14: building communities of open practice > 28 & 29 April 2014, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK > www.oer14.org > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Jan 2014, at 15:22, David Kernohan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hello Jackie – and a very happy new year to you. I’m really glad that > you’ll still be hanging around the “open education” corner of the internet > and look forward to hearing your take on the events of the next year! > > I’m speaking on a panel with Simon Nelson of FutureLearn at the end of > the month. I’ll ask him about OER and F/L MOOCs then. I might even ask him > about assessment design too… ;-) > > David > > - > David Kernohan > Jisc > > *From:* Open Educational Resources [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]> > ]*On Behalf Of *Jacqueline Carter > *Sent:* 06 January 2014 15:19 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: OERs and MOOCS > > Hello All, > > For those of you who have not seen the Jorum end of year blog post ( > http://www.jorum.ac.uk/blog/post/79/it-s-a-goodbye-from-me-and-a-goodbye-from-her-a-farewell-from-sarah-currier-and-jackie-carter) > - you'll maybe not know that I am no longer Jorum Director. I am still > however interested in all things open. > > David Kernohan and I mused over OER and MOOCs last year (in another > Jorum blog post), this followed the well-atended Libraries and Moocs day at > the British Library at which I spoke to FutureLearn's Technical Director > (sorry - can't recall his name). It would be good to get him to respond to > this list - can anyone forward him the thread? I understood that > FutureLearn were supportive of both reuse and release (where permissions > allowed) of OER - albeit that they did not expect to release all content > under CC. We did talk about how the MOOC providers could work alongside the > OER platforms to help the virtuous flow of content - and we (Jorum) planned > to pick this up in 2014. I'll leave that to my successor - Dr Susanne Boyle > (cc-ed). > > Happy New Year everyone. > > Jackie > > > > Dr Jackie Carter > UK Data Service: Director for Communications and Impact > Mimas Senior Manager: Learning and Teaching and Social Science Data > > University of Manchester Q-Step Centre Co-director > ________________________________________ > +44(0) 161 2756725 > +44(0) 774 7460963 > E: [log in to unmask] > T: @JackieCarter > _________________________________________ > Mimas > University of Manchester > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Open Educational Resources [[log in to unmask]] on behalf > of Lorna M Campbell [[log in to unmask]] > *Sent:* 06 January 2014 14:32 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: OERs and MOOCS > Hi Steve, PAt, > > Thanks, interesting to hear your experiences on using third party > materials in MOOCs. I think this is the kind of info that a lot of people > would find useful and would hopefully encourage them to consider using CC > licensed material if they are planning on running MOOCs. > > Cheers > Lorna > > On 6 Jan 2014, at 14:02, Pat Lockley wrote: > > > We also asked everyone we used - only the National Portrait Gallery > said no (which I think was the right choice given their take on NC) - but > we also told everyone we linked to what we had done and asked for how they > wanted to be attributed. > > We were concerned that a sudden MOOC user spike on a server might break > it, or lead to confused google analytics reports. > > Be interesting to see if the Delft stuff ties into > http://ocw.tudelft.nl/ocw/courses/ as in Unis with existing OER schemes > find MOOCs easier. > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Steven Stapleton < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > For the Nottingham course we released our own content under CC and also > used a lot of third party CC resources. As Lorna highlights below, that’s > ok to do in line with the terms – and FutureLearn have been very supportive > of our desire to do this. > > Wherever we used third party non-commercial CC resources – we also > contacted the rights holder to make sure they were happy with us using > their NC material in a MOOC. There were a range of opinions on the need to > do this on a thread on this list a while back. Personally, I would be happy > for anyone to use our own NC CC content in an online course without asking > us - providing it wasn’t charging for access to the content. But to make > sure we weren’t stepping over any lines with what owners of NC content > wanted – we chose to ask them. Interestingly, not one person we contacted > about using their NC resources had a problem with it – although a couple > didn’t respond at all. There were also a couple of occasions where we had > to tighten up on the attribution we provided after authors got back to us > highlighting errors or context issues. Some also signposted new CC content > that might be relevant for the course, so the process of engaging with > authors of CC material was positive and useful (and time consuming). > > Cheers, > > Steve > > > > *From:* Open Educational Resources [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On > Behalf Of *Lorna M Campbell > *Sent:* 06 January 2014 13:11 > > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: OERs and MOOCS > > > Hi Peter, > > > Yes this is interesting. > I thought I seen something in the terms for Futurelearn partners that > the institution must own all copyright for content. Don’t recall any > mention of potential for reusing others' open content but don’t take my > word on that… > > > I confess I glaze over every time I try to read terms and conditions > documents :} However as far as I can make out from FutureLearn's T&C, they > are the owners or licensee of "all necessary IPR" and "Unless otherwise > stated, copyright in the Online Content and Courses belongs to the relevant > Partner Institution providing the Online Content and Courses." > > However there is another clause that states: > > "Certain Partner Institutions may, at their own discretion, make > available certain Online Content and Courses under a Creative Commons > licence (non-Commercial). Should Partner Institutions choose to do this, it > will be clearly identified on the appropriate Online Content and Courses > page of the Website and we acknowledge that the Creative Commons licence > will override certain of these terms and conditions as appropriate. A full > copy of the relevant Creative Commons licence will be available from a link > at that point." > > So presumably that covers the Nottingham course. > > There's also stuff about not using content for commercial purposes or > to benefit third parties. > > > Incidentally, I’m trying to encourage the sharing of the content with > the MOOCs from Liverpool’s partnership with Futurelearn. More on this if > and when it happens as we’re still in the early days of getting our MOOC > plans together…. > > > Sounds good! Keep us posted :) > > Cheers > Lorna > > On 6 Jan 2014, at 12:38, Sheppard, Nick <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > I started* the Web Science MOOC from Soton…asked on Twitter and said > all resources would be released through EdShare. No further details… > > *may need to resit > > Nick > > > > *From:* Open Educational Resources [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]> > ] *On Behalf Of *Lorna M Campbell > *Sent:* 06 January 2014 12:29 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: OERs and MOOCS > > Happy New year folks! > > This is a good start to the year. Very encouraging to see another > MOOCs using open educational resources. Out of interest, does anyone know > of any other MOOCs, in addition to UoL Common Law and Nottingham > Sustainability & Society, that use OERs? > > All the best > Lorna > > On 6 Jan 2014, at 10:01, David Kernohan wrote: > > > > Hi Andy – really pleased that you are doing this and have made all the > resources openly available – great news! Pat Lockley managed to do similar > on his UoL Common Law MOOC, and we’re starting to see a few others making a > commitment to sharing. > > Happy new year, OER-DISCUSS. > > David > > - > David Kernohan > Jisc > > *From:* Open Educational Resources [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]> > ] *On Behalf Of *Andy Beggan > *Sent:* 06 January 2014 09:38 > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* OERs and MOOCS > > Dear all > > *Apologies for cross posting and the blatant pug.* > > I thought the list might be interested in this new MOOC we have just > launched on Futurelearn, titled Sustainability, Society and You ( > https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/sustainability-society-and-you). The > course tries to adhere closely to the aims and objectives of OERs as much > as possible, and is 8 weeks long with hundreds of OERs of various types > from external sources. We have also made the entire course itself available > under a Creative Commons licence. > > In particular the list may be interested in week 6 (starting 10th Feb, > but available now) which looks at learning and sustainability and in > particular to the role of OERs in sustainable practice. > > Enjoy! > > Kind regards > Andy Beggan > Head of Learning Technology > Learning Technology Blog<http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/learningtechnology/> > > About Open Nottingham<http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/open/opennottingham.aspx> > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message > in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do > not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in > any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this > email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > > > -- Lorna M Campbell -- > Assistant Director, Cetis > Web: www.cetis.ac.uk > Blog: lornamcampbell.wordpress.com > > Mail: [log in to unmask] > Twitter: LornaMCampbell > Skype: lorna120768 > > > To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to > http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm > > > -- Lorna M Campbell -- > Assistant Director, Cetis > Web: www.cetis.ac.uk > Blog: lornamcampbell.wordpress.com > > Mail: [log in to unmask] > Twitter: LornaMCampbell > Skype: lorna120768 > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message > in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do > not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in > any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this > email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > > > > > > -- Lorna M Campbell -- > Assistant Director, Cetis > Web: www.cetis.ac.uk > Blog: lornamcampbell.wordpress.com > > Mail: [log in to unmask] > Twitter: LornaMCampbell > Skype: lorna120768 > > > -- Cable Green, PhD Director of Global Learning Creative Commons @cgreen <http://twitter.com/cgreen> http://creativecommons.org/education * reuse, revise, remix & redistribute*