Print

Print


Ah, OK, to reply to myself, the 2.5.13 version is marked on that page as using /var/spool/pbs. 

Cheers
Dave

On 5 Dec 2013, at 14:01, David Crooks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Matt,
> 
> Do you have a note of the paths that changed? We've been hit by that before (path changes) so it would be useful to do some checking before doing anything else.
> 
> Cheers
> Dave
> 
> On 5 Dec 2013, at 13:09, Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>>> There is another version of Torque in the AppDB area of the EGI UMD.
>>> 
>>> https://appdb.egi.eu/store/software/software.vulnerability.group/releases/torque/2.5.13-1cri-5nik/
>>> 
>>> This version has been produced by some members of the EGI SVG (Eygene Ryabinkin and Mischa Salle did most of the work.)
>>> 
>>> This is still in 'candidate' state.    We will probably update our advisory concerning Torque next week (it is not public yet).
>>> 
>>> I understand that 2 sites have already installed this and it works fine for them.
>> 
>> Not sure if we're one of those 2 sites, but we're using this version at 
>> Lancaster (SL5 headnode, SL6 workers). No real problems, although some 
>> of the paths are different from the version of torque we were using so 
>> we had to take that into account.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Matt
>>> As it contains no currently known vulnerabilities you might like to try it,  and it would be quite good for us if another site confirms that it works.
>>> 
>>> Please note that this is rather an exceptional way of handling an issue. The version in EPEL is no longer maintained and is very old.   There is not a current recommendation on which version of Torque to use, but we may recommend the above version. (It is under discussion.)
>>> 
>>> Linda.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hill
>>>> Sent: 03 December 2013 16:07
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: which version of torque
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Elena,
>>>>    We're running 2.5.7-9 also (on SL6, EMI-3 in case that is significant).
>>>> 
>>>> John
>>>> 
>>>> On 03/12/2013 15:19, Elena Korolkova wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sheffield problem with publishing the number of jobs might be related to the
>>>> torque version (as we discussed at the meeting today).
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have torque-client-2.5.7-9 and   torque-server-2.5.7-9 in Sheffield.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do other sites have?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Elena
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Dr Elena Korolkova
>>>>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Tel.:  +44 (0)114 2223553
>>>>> Fax:   +44 (0)114 2223555
>>>>> Department of Physics and Astronomy
>>>>> University of Sheffield
>>>>> Sheffield, S3 7RH, United Kingdom
>>>>> 
>