 |
 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher J. Walker [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: 20 December 2013 14:04 > > On 20/12/13 13:27, Ewan MacMahon wrote: > > > > I'm pretty sure we decided that it was OK. > > I have to say, I've never been entirely convinced it was OK. If the VOs > were happy with world readable files, then various things could be > simplified. > Well, I think there are a couple of separate things in that. I think that we decided that the DPM webdav interface's implementation of permissions is OK, in that it appears to correctly enforce the permissions that are set on the files. Whether those permissions are set to what the VOs expected them to be, is a whole other kettle of fish. > Having said that, it does seem the default for DPM sites - so the problem > is at the DPM level. > Or at the VO level for not specifying them to be something else. Ewan