 |
 |
...so I got it all wrong then? :) 2013/11/5 Anders Hougaard <[log in to unmask]>: > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for your quick answer. > Well, my intuitive understanding of how this program works is probably > wrong, but I thought that the "bad component" data would be removed > from the orginal data causing the output to be smaller. I also thought > that the data would look less noisy on visual inspection in FSLview > but this is does not seem to be the case either. > > Best, > Anders > > > > > > 2013/11/5 Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>: >> Hi Anders >> >> On 5 Nov 2013, at 15:53, Anders Hougaard <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I am using FSL FIX to "clean" my resting state data. >> I created my own training data as described in the manual and ran FIX >> on the rest of my data using this. Everything seems to be fine but I >> can't tell the difference between the original filtered_func_data in >> my .ica directory and the filtered_func_data_clean output. I would >> have expected the cleaned files to be smaller >> >> >> Why? >> >> Cheers, Steve. >> >> but they are exactly the >> same size. >> The fix4melview files seem ok. >> Is something going wrong here? >> >> Best, >> Anders >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering >> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre >> >> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK >> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717) >> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet >> >> >> >>