 |
 |
Hi Yury, Your idea seemed to work well, however I now have 50% completeness in phi and 100% completeness in Intensities. I am not sure where I am going wrong. H K L IMEAN FOM PHI SIGIMEAN > Hi Yarrow, > > You may consider producing mtz file from your original .sca or .hkl file > first. Then take the .mtz file you have created from a .phs file and merge > the two using CAD in CCP4. I assume you need only phase information from > you .phs file, so select only two sets of parameters - FOM and PHIB - from > there and take the rest from the first file. The result will be a complete > merge.mtz with all original data plus phase information. This will assure > you do not loose anything on the way. > > Good luck, > > > Yury > > > ________________________________________ > From: CCP4 bulletin board [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Yarrow > Madrona [[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 3:43 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [ccp4bb] [CCP4] Converting ShelX .phs to mtz > > Hello CCP4 users, > > I seem to be loosing data (50%) when converting shelX .phs reflelection > file to mtz format using F2MTZ. I think it has something to do with > loosing my anamolous data. Is it possible to merge the anamolous data > before conversion or to tell F2MTZ to include it. > > These are my labels: > > H K L I FOM PHI SIGI > > Thank you > > Yarrow Madrona > > > > -- Yarrow Madrona Graduate Student Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Dept. University of California, Irvine Natural Sciences I, Rm 2403 Irvine, CA 92697