I had a poster on this in Focus 2004

Greiner and BD serum gel tubes both showed false positives using the Beckman Access. Sarstedt tubes had no false positives, Greiber were much worse than BD.

Centrifuging serum just before analysis helps however I recommend heparin plasma. I have seen no false positives in 9 years apart from one sample which had chylomicrons.

 

Mike Collins

BMS3

Biochemistry Automation

Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital

England

[log in to unmask]

http://www.nnuh.nhs.uk/

 

 

From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven John Mccann
Sent: 13 November 2013 16:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Siemens troponin I ultra assay serum v plasma and ?flyers

 

Hi there,

 

Currently we use serum (greiner tubes) for routine work however it appears that around 1 in 300 of our positive TnI results on repeating on the same specimen come back negative. We use a cut-off of 20ng/L and currently repeat all samples above this to confirm the result. Negatives go straight out. The change noticed is beyond the 20ish% CV of the assay such that on some occasions results have been > 100ng/L but on repeat are <20ng/L.  The samples are not spun prior to repeat testing. The cause is proposed to be microclots which affect us due to our rapid analysis.

 

Do other users delay analysis to allow for complete clotting or use plasma instead? Do any other labs repeat positive TnI on the same sample if serum or plasma is used to check for ‘flyers’?

 

Thank you for any replies.

 

Steven

 

Steven McCann FRCPath EurClinChem

Consultant Clinical Biochemist and Clinical Biochemistry Lead

Stepping Hill Hospital

Poplar Grove

Stockport NHS Foundation Trust

SK2 7JE

 

Tel No 0161 419 5619

Fax No 0161 419 5668

 

www.stockport.nhs.uk

www.nhslabmedservices.co.uk

 

------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses but this should not be relied upon as a guarantee that the contents are virus free.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure
under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply cannot be guaranteed

------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/