Dear Jesper,
 
Sorry for the deplayed reply, since there was something wrong with my computer.
 
I checked the qform/storm in these three b0 images, and found that qform of b0_19.nii.gz image scanned by the 19 orientation gradient table was different  from the other two. I listed them below. Is there any way for me to solve this problem?
 
(1)  b0_19 orientations:
qto_xyz:1 -1.718750 0.000000 -0.000000 109.325317
qto_xyz:2 0.000000 1.691586 -0.301044 -80.299522
qto_xyz:3 0.000000 0.304364 1.673132 -40.676346

qto_xyz:4 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000

(2)  b0_20/21 orientations:

qto_xyz:1 -1.718750 0.000000 -0.000000 107.975891
qto_xyz:2 0.000000 1.691586 -0.301044 -81.648949
qto_xyz:3 0.000000 0.304364 1.673132 -40.676346

qto_xyz:4 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000

 

Their  sform are same.

sform_xorient: Right-to-Left
sform_yorient: Posterior-to-Anterior

sform_zorient: Inferior-to-Superior

 

Thanks so much for your concern!

 

Yours,

Lulu



2013/10/7 Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>
Dear Lulu,

I was trying to do pre-processing with our high angular resolution diffusion data from Siemens 3T.The acquisition was divided into 3 consecutive scans of 5 minutes each, to improve the comfort of the subject. They consisted of three blocks of 19, 20 and 21 orientations each. Each of these three acquisitions have one b0 images.
I read the manual of fsl's tool 'eddy' and 'topup', and I think that our data could be correctd(eddy current and suscepbility problem) by these two tools (Am I right?).
I extracted three b0 images, and tring to merge them together, but it gave me an error:

'fslMerge fault:Inconsistent orientations for individual images when attempting to merge.
Merge will use voxel-based orientation which is probably incorrect -*PLEASE CHECK*!'

I am not sure that if this problem is related to my gradient orientation, and if this problem would influence my following processing.

I don't think this has to do with your gradient directions. It sounds either like a round off error in the voxel size fields, or the storm/qform is different. I suggest you use fslhd to check those things.

Another problem is about the acqparams.txt file. Since we have three b0 images, and our phase encoding direction is R>>L, EPI factor is 128, echo spacing is 0.85 ms, I wrote the acqparams.txt file like this
" 1 0 0 0.108
-1 0 0 0.108
1 0 0 0.108
-1 0 0 0.108
1 0 0 0.108
-1 0 0 0.108"
Is this the right way to write the acqparams file for our three b0 images?

There is documentation about how to write these here http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TOPUP/Faq and here http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/EDDY/Faq.

However, it is not clear from your description if you acquired b=0 scans with reversed phase encode blips. Your acqparams file implies you have six b=0 files acquired R->L, L->R, R->L, L->R,  R->L, L->R in that order. Is that correct?

Jesper
  

Thanks in advance!

Lulu