 |
 |
Dear Rasmus and Wim, Thank you sincerely. We will test the updates and get back to you with Feedback. All the best Dean On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Rasmus Fogh wrote: > Dear Dean, > > We are in the process of merging together our various development versions, and it turned out we had actually tried to fix that problem in another branch. I have merged in the fix into the stable version and put it on the update server, so if you try to get the most recent updates that should hopefully solve the problem. > > Please let us know how it works. > > Cheers, > > Rasmus > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask] > Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, > 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002 > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Strotz von Moos Dean wrote: > >> Dear Wim, >> >> We had time to test the update and I would like to give you some feedback. >> >> Unfortunately, there are a few peaks that are not exported in their compressed form any longer; i.e. 33.HG3,33.HG2;33.H is exported as 33.HG3,33.HG2;33.H rather than 33.QG;33.H. >> >> I include a peak number list for you: 913, 989, 1022, 1062, 1104, 1259 (this is a set of the peaks that are not exported in compressed form, there are almost certainly more of them). >> >> Could you take another crack at it? >> >> Sincerely >> >> Dean >> >> >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Wim Vranken wrote: >> >>> Dear Dean, >>> >>> Thanks, that's very nice to hear. As for the assignment export, the code was definitely limited in how it was dealing with 'compressResonances', I've modified it and it should work correctly now as far as I can tell (but let me know of course if it doesn't). >>> >>> Wayne will notify when it's on the update server! >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Wim >>