congratulations to Jane, this is vauable results for midwives
Dr. Reem Hatamleh, PhD, RN, RMW
assistant professor in Midwifery
Maternal and Child Health and Midwifery Department
Jordan university of Science and Technology/ Faculty of Nursing
mail address: P.O Box 3030 Irbid 22110, Jordan
phone: 0096227201000 Ext, 23712
e.mail: [log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]

From: Church Sarah <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 2:46 AM
Subject: Re: Cochrane News: Women Who Receive Midwife Care Throughout Their Pregnancy and Birth Have Better Outcomes

Dear Jane and the team,
Congratulations -  this is a significant systematic review for midwives.
Sarah
 
Dr Sarah Church
Senior Lecturer - Midwifery
School of Health
University of Northampton
Boughton Green Road
Northampton
NN2 7AL
 
Tel 01604 89 2275 (direct)
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Sheridan, Valerie M [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 22 August 2013 09:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Cochrane News: Women Who Receive Midwife Care Throughout Their Pregnancy and Birth Have Better Outcomes

Many congratulations to you Jane and the team; this is so useful for lots of reasons!
 
Valerie
 
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sandall, Jane
Sent: 21 August 2013 12:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Cochrane News: Women Who Receive Midwife Care Throughout Their Pregnancy and Birth Have Better Outcomes
 
 
From: Wiley Science Newsroom [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 19 August 2013 11:00
To: Beal, Jennifer - Chichester
Subject: Cochrane News: Women Who Receive Midwife Care Throughout Their Pregnancy and Birth Have Better Outcomes
 
Image removed by sender. 
To view this email as a webpage click here
Women Who Receive Midwife Care Throughout Their Pregnancy and Birth Have Better Outcomes
Maternity care that involves a midwife as the main care provider leads to better outcomes for most women, according to a systematic review published in The Cochrane Library. Researchers found that women who received continued care throughout pregnancy and birth from a small group of midwives were less likely to give birth pre-term and required fewer interventions during labour and birth than when their care was shared between different obstetricians, GPs and midwives.
In many countries, including the UK and Australia, midwives act as the main providers of care for women throughout pregnancy, labour and birth. In midwife-led care, there is an emphasis on normality, continuity of care and being cared for by a known, trusted midwife during labour. Midwife-led continuity of care is provided in a multi-disciplinary network of consultation and referral with other care providers. This contrasts with medical-led models of care, where an obstetrician or family physician is primarily responsible for care, and with shared-care, where responsibility is shared between different healthcare professionals. There has been some debate about whether the midwife-led model of care is more effective.
The researchers reviewed data from 13 trials involving a total of 16,242 women. Eight trials included women at low risk of complications and five trials included women at high risk of complications. They looked at outcomes for mothers and babies when midwives were the main providers of care, compared to medical-led or shared care models. When midwives were the main providers of care throughout, women were less likely to give birth before 37 weeks or lose their babies before 24 weeks. Women were happier with the care they received, had fewer epidurals, fewer assisted births, and fewer episiotomies. An episiotomy involves making a surgical incision to reduce the risk of a tear. In addition, women who received midwife-led care were no more likely to have a caesarean birth, but they were in labour for about half an hour longer on average.
Based on these results, the researchers conclude that all women should be offered midwife-led continuity of care unless they have serious medical or obstetric complications. “Women should be encouraged to ask for this option,” said lead researcher Jane Sandall of the Division of Women’s Health at King’s College London in London, UK, who led an interdisciplinary team of researchers from Sheffield Hallam University, The University of Warwick and National University of Ireland Galway. “Policymakers in areas of the world where health systems do not provide midwife-led care should consider the importance of midwives in improving maternity care and how financing of midwife-led services can be reviewed to support this.”
Five studies considered the cost of midwife-led compared to shared care. While care provided by midwives was more cost-effective during labour, the results for postnatal care were inconclusive. “There was a lack of consistency in the way that maternity care cost was estimated in the studies, but there seemed to be a trend towards a cost-saving effect of midwife-led care,” said Sandall.
Full citation: Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D.; Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub3.
 
About The Cochrane Library
The Cochrane Library contains high quality health care information, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Systematic Reviews bring together research on the effects of health care and are considered the gold standard for determining the relative effectiveness of different interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration (http://www.cochrane.org/) is a UK registered international charity and the world's leading producer of systematic reviews. It has been demonstrated that Cochrane Systematic Reviews are of comparable or better quality and are updated more often than the reviews published in print journals (Wen J et al; The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008; 61: 770-775).
In June 2013, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews received an impact factor of 5.703, from Thomson ISI.
The Cochrane Library is published by Wiley on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
The Cochrane Library Podcasts: a collection of podcasts on a selection of Cochrane Reviews by authors of reviews in this issue will be available from http://dmmsclick.wiley.com/click.asp?p=22624725&m=77372&u=2058459.
Accessing The Cochrane Library
The Cochrane Library can be accessed at www.thecochranelibrary.com. Guest users may access abstracts and plain language summaries for all reviews in the database, and members of the media may request full access to the contents of the Library. For further information, see contact details below. A number of countries, including countries in the World Bank’s list of low- and low- middle income economies (countries with a gross national income (GNI) per capita of less than $4700), have national provisions by which some or all of their residents are able to access The Cochrane Library for free. To find out more, please visit http://dmmsclick.wiley.com/click.asp?p=22624725&m=77372&u=2058460.
 
 

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
The University of Northampton joins the global Social Enterprise elite and is the first Ashoka U 'Changemaker Campus' in the UK; recognised for the excellence of our extensive social enterprise, innovation and entrepreneurship provision. See more about this on our website http://changemakercampus.org.uk/
96% of our graduates are in employment or further study six months after completing their courses. See more about this on our website www.northampton.ac.uk/about
This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using, printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or any information contained in it. We virus scan all E-mails leaving The University of Northampton but no warranty is given that this E-mail and any attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus checking. The right to monitor E-mail communications through our networks is reserved by us.