I have to ask flamingly: So what about CC1/2 and CC*?
Did we not replace an arbitrary resolution cut-off based on a value of Rmerge with an arbitrary resolution cut-off based on a value of Rmeas already? And now we are going to replace that with an arbitrary resolution cut-off based on a value of CC* or
is it CC1/2?
I am asked often: What value of CC1/2 should I cut my resolution at? What should I tell my students? I've got a course coming up and I am sure they will ask me again.
Jim
Hi all,
does this not again bring up the still prevailing adherence to R factors and not a shift to correlation coefficients ( CC1/2 and CC*) ? (as Dr. Phil Evans has indicated).?
The way we look at data quality ( by "we" I mean the end users ) needs to be altered, I guess.
best,