It is very similar with my situation: we are trying to crystallize Fab fragments. All we got is spherulites. After rMMS-seeding we got better shaped crystals with only 5 A resolution. So now I think that this caused by free cysteine near Fab-Fc knee. Oxidation of them leads to uncontrolled aggregation and I am trying to figure out how to protect free cysteine without reduction of disulphide bridges between heavy and light chains.
So, here is the question: do you have free cys residues and are your protein is monodisperse (SE-chromatography or DLS)?
P.S.: I am sorry for any mistakes in my letter because Thunderbird does not provide any grammar checking tool.
20.08.2013 04:13, Mahesh Lingaraju пишет:
Hi Jürgen
you are right, I did not try any major optimization yet. I only tried to vary PEG and protein concentration. That did not really improve things too much. The protein mostly forms spherulites beyond 25% PEG. I am also thinking that these crystals are poorly diffracting/not diffracting as they might be growing from sub-microscopic spherulites ? Thanks for the insights
Mahesh
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Well said Petri,
also how much PEG3350 do you have in your conditions ? More than 25% ? I'm going after cryo-conditions at this point, you might want to replace your PEG3350 with smaller PEGs or a mixture of PEG400 and PEG3350.Almost sounds as if no optimization of the original conditions was performed yet.
Plenty to do for you, also since you have some crystal use them for seeding into your new screens.
Jürgen
On Aug 19, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Mahesh Lingaraju wrote:
Hi Petri
They are non-diffracting at the home source and they are cryo cooled. Like david suggested I guess ill try introducing a buffer as my condition does not have a buffer. it is ammonium acetate and PEG 3350.
Thanks for the encouragement !
Mahesh
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Petri Kursula <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,
non-diffracting on the home source or state-of-the-art synchrotron? Cryocooled or room-temperature? What happens if you change the buffer but keep your pH? etc etc...
For an important project, one should never ever give up.
Petri
---Petri Kursula, PhDproject leader, adjunct professorDepartment of Biochemistry & Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, FinlandDepartment of Chemistry, University of Hamburg/DESY, Germany---
On Aug 19, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Mahesh Lingaraju <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello people
I recently obtained hexagonal rod like crystals (150x50x20 um) which turned out to be non diffracting. What is the usual convention for cases like this ? do people usually give up on the condition or still try to optimize it ?
The crystals are also not very reproducible. I believe it is because of ammonium acetate in the condition causing fluctuations in the pH because of its volatility. Is there any way to work around such a problem ?
Thanks
Mahesh
......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742
Lab: +1-410-614-4894
Fax: +1-410-955-2926
http://lupo.jhsph.edu
-- Eugene Osipov Junior Research Scientist Laboratory of Enzyme Engineering A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry Russian Academy of Sciences Leninsky pr. 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia e-mail: [log in to unmask]