Print

Print


for #2)

I'd suggest get some of those Mitigen loops that are titled. I assume you have hexagonal plates as crystals and you really want to shoot along the thin area of the crystal down the sixfold. With normal loops it's an art to get that crystal to sit upright in the loop but not impossible if you take smaller loops.

My longest axis collected was 420 Å to ~2 Å resolution by this method.

Jürgen

On Aug 16, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Zbyszek Otwinowski wrote:

This is clearly a case of a crystal with a very long unit cell; a case
which should be approached mindfully.

HKL2000 has a default search for indexing solutions such that diffraction
along the longest unit cell will be resolved, with the assumed spot size.

The problem with such diffraction has 2 aspects:
1) how to process the already collected data where the spots are close to
each other;
2) how to collect future data.

Ad 1) The best solution is to reduce the spot size, so the spots are
resolved. This may require an adjustment of spot size by a single pixel;
one should not only change spot radius, but also change the box size
between even and odd number of pixels in the box dimensions.

Just changing the spot radius changes the spot diameter by an even number
of pixels, so if one wants to change the spot diameter by one pixel, one
has to change the box size. This is the consequence of the spot being in
the center of the box.

Just during indexing, there is also a workaround by specifying the command
before indexing: longest vector followed by a number that defines the
upper limit of the cell size. This may help finding indexing, but will
create overlaps between spots during refinement and integration.

This dataset presents a problem of collecting data by rotating on the axis
perpendicular to the long unit cell. In consequence, the Image 1 has
essentially (barely differing in centroid position) overlapping spots, so
it would be hard to process them meaningfully by any program.

Ad. 2) What would be a better way to collect data in the future?


Hi CCP4 folks

I have a data set which is looks twinned ( see the image-1  - I zoomed on
to the image so that one can spot the twinning. Furthermore, the spots are
very smeary from ~ 30 - 120 degrees of data collection, see image 2) I
tried using HKL2000 and mosflm to process this data but i cannot process
it. I was wondering if anyone has any ideas as to how to process this data
or comments on whether this data is even useful. Also, I would really
appreciate if someone could share their experiences on solving twinning
issues during crystal growth

Thanks in advance !

Mahesh[image: Inline image 2][image: Inline image 3]



Zbyszek Otwinowski
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-8816
Tel. 214-645-6385
Fax. 214-645-6353

......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:      +1-410-614-4894
Fax:      +1-410-955-2926
http://lupo.jhsph.edu