 |
 |
Dear all, My understanding, admittedly this was two years ago when I had graduated, was that to get Job Seekers Allowance you have to be available for work at short notice. Doing, for example 20 hours per weeks for three months, would not entitle you to any money. I am sure there are ways around the system but I remember during the four months I signed on being very anxious about doing one day a week volunteering in the sector. I didn't and thankfully I found a paid traineeship and then another paid post. I feel there is also a lot more effort in getting volunteer posts now; application forms, cover letters, CVs and and interviews when I remember after seeing a post on here offering one day a week volunteering, which suited me as I was a student with nothing else to do on a Friday. I worry there is an expectation to dedicate months to an unpaid post, excluding those such a myself who cannot afford to work unpaid in the long term put that together with taught course fees plus the lack of permanent (and well paid) assistant roles for many to consider long distance the numbers of qualified archivists will fall and eventually we will be on here complaining of a shortfall in professionals or professionals being expected to return to Graduate trainee roles. Absolutely it is up to the individual to take a post like this and others offered but do consider what that willingness is to doing those who are capable but simply cannot offer that time without payment. Shanine Salmon On 15 August 2013 09:23, Nicola Waddington <[log in to unmask] > wrote: > Dear All, > We all talk a lot about whether or not internships are affordable for the > candidate and whether they are fair or not for people without a private > income. The same debate is live in both the museum and arts worlds too. I > wonder if any research has been done into the current rules of job seekers > allowance? Would the rules allow for someone to undertake a part time > unpaid internship for a fixed period? If so could we perhaps design the > internships we offer to accommodate people who receive the benefit, and who > could thus undertake voluntary experience without losing money? Could this > perhaps be a research project for ARA, or be looked into by the Section for > New Professionals? > It could be a productive approach to an age old debate. > Nicola Waddington > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Archivists, conservators and records managers. [mailto: > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Meic Pierce Owen > Sent: 15 August 2013 09:03 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Vacancy for Archives and Records Management Intern, Solutions > > I understand the argument being put up against this unpaid internship > being offered. I understand it but I do not agree with it. > > To offer an internship on its own terms is surely the business of the body > offering the internship? Equally, if someone wishes to take it up, that is > surely that person's business? If it does not suit anyone, the offer will > not be taken up. It is a classic case of 'let the market decide'. If this > sort of opportunity were the only sort on offer it would be one thing, but > as it is not, I suggest we climb off our high horses and allow people to > offer and accept as suits them. > > I strongly agree that, as a profession, we need to do what we can to > ensure that those at all levels earn a living wage and indeed, those of us > around before the millennium will remember the appalling salaries being > offered to recently-qualifieds before the then SOA put its foot down (I > believe) and refused to take adverts offering under particular salary rates. > > I further think we should be pleased both that so many are looking to > enter the Profession and that pre-course positions are available. > > We cannot however, get involved in the business of trying to impose quotas > on academic institutions. If people wish to study, who are we to say no?- > just so long as we are not giving a false impression to people as to the > numbers of jobs available. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Archivists, conservators and records managers. [mailto: > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pamela Birch > Sent: 15 August 2013 08:05 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Vacancy for Archives and Records Management Intern, Solutions > > Bedford BC Not Protectively Marked. > > > Thanks Joseph, you summed up my feelings on this nicely. > > > > Having spent this year looking at the history of Bedfordshire Record > Office I would also point out that it was an 'independently wealthy, well > intentioned, do-gooder' who managed to kick start the profession of > archivist (in local government terms at least) 100 years ago by founding a > county record office and providing on the job training, something he > continued to do until his death in 1940. > > > > Pamela Birch > Conservator/Premises & Projects Officer > > Bedfordshire & Luton Archives & Records Service > 800 years of history, 100 years of service. Centenary 2013. Help us > celebrate www.bedford.gov.uk/archivecentenary > <http://www.bedford.gov.uk/archivecentenary> > > Open: Mon 9am-7pm, Tues, Wed & Fri 9am-5pm. Closed Thursday. > Tel: 01234 228908 (direct line) 01234 228833 (main office) > www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/archive Twitter @BedsArchives > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Archivists, conservators and records managers. > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph Bartoletti > Sent: 14 August 2013 18:09 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Vacancy for Archives and Records Management Intern, Solutions > > > > > I feel compelled to offer another side to this debate. Since this argument > is continually used again and again, can someone tell me what profession > enforces a quota on University placements? I'm going to have to say none. > At the end of the day Universities are in the business of teaching and > academia, nothing more. While they may have some indirect concern with the > number of graduates employed six months after graduation (looks good in > stats) they are not there to rig the job market. If they have turned out > more quality candidates than the market can accept, well bad for some of > the graduates but good for the profession. > > Also, 'independently wealthy, well intentioned, do-gooders' are not a new > incarnation due to the current economic climate. They were in fact the > cornerstones for much of the museum profession. > > Some direct points to Craig's 'simple solutions'. > > 1. Decide on a set number of students to be admitted to the > archive schools each year. Any archives school that admits more than their > quota should lose their accreditation. > Again, this has been stated over and over in the past. State > exactly how this should be done accurately. Continually monitor the job > market for anyone retiring or changing professions? Adequately gauging this > year after year is not pragmatic. Again, the job of the Universities is to > turn out qualified suitable candidates. Every degree / profession have > people who for whatever reason go into another field and there are more > people who work in fields different to their degrees than those that do. I > spent eight months unemployed shortly after finishing my course and never > once did I blame the number of graduates. > I had many near misses and always lost out to experience. Certainly not > the Uni's fault. > 2. Legally define and protect the term 'archivist'. Define the > term to mean someone who has a recognised qualification from one of the > archive schools. > Not possible and nor should it be. Even if it was, then what? > Maybe instead of the term 'archivist' organizations will just use titles > like 'Keepers of Old Info and Stuff'. Plus what about all those > professionals who do not have a degree and have done WAY more for the > profession than most with the piece of paper? I guess there's no room > anymore for anyone rising up through the ranks of the profession without a > degree. > 3. Legally require all organisations subject to Section 46 - > Freedom of Information Act to employ an archivist. > You're leaving out people who have specifically done records > management degrees. > 4. The ICO should produce guidelines strongly advising the > retention of a qualified archivist in the role of an organisations > designated Data Protection Officer. > Why? What does the qualification of archivist bring to this role? > I am a qualified archivist (so my piece of paper tells me) and have a BCS > Cert in DPA. I do not agree that having the former was a huge factor in > earning the latter. If any argument can be made it is that the role should > be taken on by someone with a degree in law not archives management. > > Maybe people should stop blaming the Universities and move on to > something more productive? Society has gone information mad, and so there > should be no shortage of opportunities. We need to better fight the > information profession's corner and prove its worth. > > A good example is when a coursemate applied for a job at a school. > The job advert screamed 'Archivist', but the title was far from that. Not > one of the candidates who landed an interview had any experience or > qualification in archives. I'm sure many more have stories similar, and > while I know I don't have the answers, I do know that 'excessive' amounts > of graduates is not the problem. > > It should go without saying that the views express are entirely my > own and not my employer's. > > > Sincerely, > > Joseph Bartoletti > Corporate Records Management Officer > > Legal and Democratic Services > > ________________________________ > > Any opinions or statements expressed in this e-mail are those of the > individual and not necessarily those of Middlesbrough Council. Internet > communications are not secure and therefore Middlesbrough Council does not > accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message as it has been > transmitted over a public network. If you suspect the message may have been > intercepted or amended, please call the sender. > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be > legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. > If you receive this in error, please do not disclose any information to > anyone and notify the sender at the above address. Any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted, in reliance on the contents, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > Middlesbrough Council's computer systems and communications may be > monitored to ensure effective operation of the system and for other lawful > purposes. > > Save energy, money and the environment - is it really necessary to print > this message? > > ** This email has been scanned for viruses, vandals and malicious content. > ** > > ________________________________ > > Contact the list owner for assistance at > [log in to unmask] > > For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a > holiday) see the list website at > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra > > > Information security classification* of this email: > > > > UNCLASSIFIED: No breaches of Data Protection Act or Statutory Obligations. > > PROTECT: Information that could cause harm to individual or group and > breaches Data Protection Act and breaches statutory obligations > > RESTRICTED: Information of high significance (causes significant harm) to > individuals, groups and business; breaches Data Protection Act and > Statutory obligation > > > > Bedford Borough Council:-This email contains information intended for the > addressee only and may be confidential, the subject of legal or > professional privilege, or be otherwise protected from disclosure. This > transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain > sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be > handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to > receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to > anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify > the sender immediately. > > > > All GCSx traffic? may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in > accordance with relevant legislation. This email and any attached file are > the property of Bedford Borough Council. Any opinions expressed in this > mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Bedford Borough Council. > > ? Bedford Borough Council is continuously working towards the requirements > of the Government Secure Intranet (GSi) > > Please delete if you are not the intended recipient > > > > “Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail and any > attachment may be confidential and may contain legally privileged > information. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. If > you are not the named recipient, please notify us immediately and delete it > from your system. In such an event, you should not disclose the contents > of this e-mail to any other person, or print it.” > > Contact the list owner for assistance at > [log in to unmask] > > For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a > holiday) see the list website at > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra > > Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing quality of > life - Making best use of public resources. > > The information in this email is solely for the intended recipients. > > If you are not an intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, > or distribute its contents or use them in any way: please advise > the sender immediately and delete this email. > > Perth & Kinross Council, Live Active Leisure Limited and > TACTRAN do not warrant that this email or any attachments are > virus-free and does not accept any liability for any loss or damage > resulting from any virus infection. Perth & Kinross Council may > monitor or examine any emails received by its email system. > > The information contained in this email may not be the views of > Perth & Kinross Council, Live Active Leisure Limited or TACTRAN. > It is possible for email to be falsified and the sender cannot be > held responsible for the integrity of the information contained in it. > > Requests to Perth & Kinross Council under the Freedom of > Information (Scotland) Act should be directed to the Freedom of > Information Team - email: [log in to unmask] > > General enquiries to Perth & Kinross Council should be made to > [log in to unmask] or 01738 475000. > > General enquiries to Live Active Leisure Limited should be made > to > [log in to unmask] or 01738 454654. > > General enquiries to TACTRAN should be made to > [log in to unmask] or 01738 475775. > > Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing quality of > life - Making best use of public resources. > > > > > Contact the list owner for assistance at > [log in to unmask] > > For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a > holiday) see the list website at > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra > > Contact the list owner for assistance at > [log in to unmask] > > For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a > holiday) see the list website at > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra > Contact the list owner for assistance at [log in to unmask] For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra