Yes. Best Regards, Donald McLaren ================= D.G. McLaren, Ph.D. Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren Office: (773) 406-2464 ===================== This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773) 406-2464 or email. On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Knut-Kristian Kolskår < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi > > > I am sorry to bother you with what probably a quite basic question. I have > scrolled through the mailing-list, but I am still a little insecure of how > to implement my analysis. > > I am analyzing a blocked-designed paradigm where the manipulation is > related to increasing load. > I have defined one regressor for each load-condition (control, load 1-4), > and want to look at task general activation and activation related to > increase of load. > I have defined the T-contrasts for task general activation:(-4 1 1 1 1) > where -4 reflects the control condition, and for effect of load i have > defined the T-contrast (0 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5). > > But is this correct? > Thank you in advance. > > Regards > > Knut K >