close. a 1.y or 2.y are approved versions, at some point in time the version (and that depends upon what the organization has decided) will get revved up to the next X level. the minor ys have been basically approved but not enough to make the document go to the next whole version. maybe once a year you get all the minor versions ratified and the whold document becomes a new version

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Marc Fresko <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

OK.  I’m beginning to get the hang of this “x.y” version numbering.

 

In the red corner, we have the view that when “y” is zero, it means “approved” while when “y” is anything else, it means “unapproved draft”.  So for example 1.0, 2.0 etc. are approved, 1.1, 3.127 are draft.  To put it another way, the “y” has an implicit second meaning.

 



--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]