close. a 1.y or 2.y are approved versions, at some point in time the version (and that depends upon what the organization has decided) will get revved up to the next X level. the minor ys have been basically approved but not enough to make the document go to the next whole version. maybe once a year you get all the minor versions ratified and the whold document becomes a new version On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Marc Fresko <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > OK. I’m beginning to get the hang of this “x.y” version numbering.**** > > ** ** > > *In the red corner,* we have the view that when “y” is zero, it means > “approved” while when “y” is anything else, it means “unapproved draft”. > So for example 1.0, 2.0 etc. are approved, 1.1, 3.127 are draft. To put it > another way, the “y” has an implicit second meaning.**** > > > -- Peter Kurilecz CRM CA [log in to unmask] Richmond, Va http://twitter.com/RAINbyte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/ http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/ http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]