I would hazard a guess that it was something adopted from the software industry where major new software versions are identified by a numeral left of the decimal point. minor versions of the software to the right. new software not approved for release ie ratified are expressed as 0.n

I suspect that with the advent and use of word processing software in the development/drafting of documents that this type of numbering scheme was adopted to keep track of the various drafts aka versions.

just speculating before tomorrow's celebrations begin

pak

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Marc Fresko <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I am perplexed: this and other contributions seem to be  based on an assumption that “version 1.0 means final”.  Why so? 

So, again I ask  why this assumption exists…  Where does it come from?  Who says?


Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]




--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]