 |
 |
After some groping in my browser's bottom drawer, I have located a link to what appears (by virtue of the number of removed comments) to be what is referred to below: http://discussion.guardian.co.uk/discussion/p/3hj5k Best wishes to all, Ted. On 29-Jul-2013 09:25:33 the.Duke.of.URL wrote: > Hi all, > > IDS has just praised his own achievements in the Guardian. But these > comments are about the Guardian's response to these comments among > comments about a cartoon by Martin Rowson. It goes without saying that > every comment I read on IDS's piece was negative, some extremely so and > many incredibly articulate. > > Here are responses to the Guardian concerning it apparently closing the > comments before time and removing some. I should point out that while > there were 5 pages of comments, the number was only 357, not a large > number by certain standards. No doubt some of the removals were carried > out due to their inappropriateness. But this doesn't explain all G's > actions with respect to this piece. > > > Huples > 29 July 2013 8:56am > > Nice toon but... > > We are all in the Matrix. > Comments stopped on IDS article and ability to recommend the excellent > postings there also disabled. > We can selective comment but not when we as a huge majority disagree > with an ATL writer or with the Guardian's decision to allow him print > space. > > A crime against a disabled person is a crime against all of us. Open the > comments now Guardian and stop aiding and abetting the enemies of the > disabled > > good2goHuples > 29 July 2013 9:38am > > Yes I noticed that---IDS article started at 6.14pm-- > was closed before 10pm--- also a lot of comments > removed. > good2gogood2go > 29 July 2013 9:46am > > the depth of feeling against this man was undeniable--- it leapt > out at you from the unanimous verdict of the comments--- > Was there a complaint from up above? > > ****************************************************** > Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your > message will go only to the sender of this message. > If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's > 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically > to [log in to unmask] > Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and > cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by > subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical > Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of > our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk. > ******************************************************* ------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]> Date: 29-Jul-2013 Time: 10:58:33 This message was sent by XFMail ------------------------------------------------- ****************************************************** Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your message will go only to the sender of this message. If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically to [log in to unmask] Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk. *******************************************************